Geografie 2020, 125, 447-472
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2020125040447
Falling into a digital world: how are paper and interactive maps used by digital natives and immigrants?
References
1. 2012): ‘At the next junction, turn left’: Attitudes towards Sat Nav use. Area, 44, 2, 170–177.
< , S., SPEAKE J., CRAWFORD K. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01086.x>
2. 2013): Exergames for health and fitness: the roles of GPS and geosocial apps. International Journal of Health Geographics, 12, 18.
< , M.N.K., YANG, S.P. (https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-12-18>
3. DO, T.M.T., BLOM, J., GATICA-PEREZ, D. (2011): Smartphone usage in the wild. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ACM, New York, 353–360.
4. 1992): The breakdown of communist regimes and the vicissitudes of modernity. Daedalus, 121, 2, 21–41.
, S.’E.N. (
5. FOWLER, F.J. (2013): Survey research methods. SAGE, Los Angeles.
6. 2017): Envisioning the future of cartographic research. International Journal of Cartography, 3, sup1, 1–8.
< , A.L., ROBINSON, A.C., ROTH, R.E. (https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1316466>
7. 2017): Designing across map use contexts: A research agenda. International Journal of Cartography, 3, sup1, 90–114.
< , A.L., WHITE, T., FISH, C., TOMIO, B., HUANG, H., SLUTER, C.R., BRAVO, J.V.M., FABRIKANT, S.I., BLEISCH, S., YAMADA, M., PICANÇO, P. (https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1315988>
8. 2011): Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13, 6, 963–980.
< , M., ARGENTIN, G. (https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389751>
9. 2008): Digital natives, digital immigrants: an analysis of age and ict competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 3, 235–254.
< , R.X., DOBSON, T., PETRINA, S. (https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.a>
10. 2016): What does a map-skills-test tell us about Czech pupils? Geografie, 121, 2, 279–299.
< , M., MARADA, M. (https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2016121020279>
11. 2019): Research into map-analysis strategies: theory- and datadriven approaches. Geografie, 124, 2, 187–216.
< , L., HANUS, M. (https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2019124020187>
12. HAVLIK, D., SCHIMAK, G. (2014): State and trends in mobile observation applications. International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, 294-303.
13. 2013): Will we be lost without paper maps in the digital age? Journal of Information Science, 39, 1, 48–60.
< , P., CLOUGH, P. (https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512470043>
14. 2013): Comparing first and second generation digital natives’ Internet use, Internet anxiety, and Internet identification. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 16, 7, 549–552.
< , R., GAVIN, J., BROSNAN, M., CROMBY, J., GREGORY, H., GUILLER, J., MARAS, P., MOON, A. (https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0526>
15. KRAAK, M.J., BROWN, A. (2001): Web cartography: Developments and prospects. Taylor & Francis. London, New York.
16. 2010): Are ‘digital natives’ really digitally competent? – A study on Chinese teenagers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 6, 1029–1042.
< , Y., RANIERI, M. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01053.x>
17. 2003): Technology and map-learning: users, methods, and symbols. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 4, 828–850. Merriam-Webster.com, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/generation (11.07.2019).
< , R.E., BUNCH, R.L. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2003.09304004.x>
18. 2002): Cognitive map-design research in the twentieth century: theoretical and empirical approaches. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29, 3, 283–304.
< , D.R. (https://doi.org/10.1559/152304002782008503>
19. 2005): Paper versus pixel: effectiveness of paper versus electronic maps to teach map reading skills in an introductory physical geography course. Journal of Geography, 104, 5, 195–202.
< , P., FARRELL, P., MCPHEE, E. (https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340508978984>
20. POPELKA, S., DVORSKY, J., BRYCHTOVA, A., HANZELKA, J. (2013): User typology based on eye-movement paths. In: Proceedings of International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference, SGEM, Sofia, 1041–1048.
21. 2001): Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 5, 1–6.
, M. (
22. RAMANAU, R., HOSEIN, A., JONES, C. (2010): Learning and living technologies: a longitudinal study of first-year students’ expectations and experiences in the use of ICT. In: Dirckinck- Holmfeld, L. (ed.): Proceedings of the seventh International Conference on Networked Learning 2010. Aalborg University, Aalborg, 627–634.
23. 2012): Cartographic interaction primitives: Framework and synthesis. The Cartographic Journal, 49, 4, 376–395.
< , R.E. (https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019>
24. 2019): How do user-centered design studies contribute to cartography? Geografie, 124, 2, 133–161.
< , R.E. (https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2019124020133>
25. 2017): User studies in cartography: Opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 1, 1, 1–29.
, R.E., ÇÖLTEKIN, A., DELAZARI, L., FILHO, H.F., GRIFFIN, A., HALL, A., KORPI, J., LOKKA, I., MENDONÇA, A., OOMS, K., VAN ELZAKKER, C.P.J.M. (
26. 2010): Student and faculty intergenerational digital divide: Fact or fiction? Computers & Education, 55, 3, 1393–1403.
< , F.D., SCHÖNWETTER, D.J., CLEGHORN, B.M. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.017>
27. SHESKIN, D.J. (2004): Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
28. 2015): “I’ve got my Sat Nav, it’s alright”: Users’ attitudes towards, and engagements with, technologies of navigation. The Cartographic Journal, 52, 4, 345–355.
< , J. (https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2015.1108663>
29. 2012): “I never use ‘maps’ anymore”: Engaging with Sat Nav Technologies and the implications for cartographic literacy and spatial awareness. The Cartographic Journal, 49, 4, 326–336.
< , J., AXON, S. (https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000021>
30. 2018): Effect of Size, Shape and Map Background in Cartographic Visualization: Experimental Study on Czech and Chinese Populations. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 11, 427.
< , Z., ŠAŠINKA, Č., ČENĚK, J., ANGSÜSSER, S., KUBÍČEK, P., ŠTĚRBA, Z., BILÍKOVÁ, M. (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7110427>
31. 2019): Cross-cultural differences in figure–ground perception of cartographic stimuli. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 46, 1, 82–94.
< , Z., ŠAŠINKA, Č., ČENĚK, J., ŠTĚRBA, Z., ANGSUESSER, S., FABRIKANT, S.I., ŠTAMPACH, R., MORONG K. (https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2018.1470575>
32. ŠTĚRBA, Z., ŠAŠINKA, Č., STACHOŇ, Z., ŠTAMPACH, R., MORONG, K. (2015): Selected Issues of Experimental Testing in Cartography. Masaryk University Press, Masaryk.
33. 1996): Looking back: The year 1989 as a cultural and civilizational break. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29, 2, 115–129.
< , P. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(96)80001-8>
34. 2005): How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53, 5-6, 433–441.
< , M.S., NEWCOMBE, N.S. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6765-0>
35. WAKABAYASHI, Y. (2019): Intergenerational differences in the use of maps: results from an online survey. In: ICC 2019 Proceedings, http://home.hol.is.uec.ac.jp/icc2019papers/all/308.pdf (31.08.2019).
36. 2013): Digital natives and digital immigrants. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5, 6, 409–419.
< , Q., MYERS, M.D., SUNDARAM, D. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y>
37. 2012): The use of social media: an exploratory study of usage among digital natives. Journal of Public Affairs, 12, 2, 127–136.
< , D.L., CRITTENDEN, V.L., KEO, T., MCCARTY, P. (https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1414>