Geografie 2025, 130, 115-141

https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2025.006

Spatial patterns of travel behaviour in Czechia: Continuity or change?

Stanislav Kraft1ID, Petr Tonev2ID

1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Education, Department of Geography, České Budějovice, Czechia
2Masaryk University, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of Regional Economics, Brno, Czechia

Received February 2025
Accepted May 2025

References

1. ANDERSEN, A. K. (2002): Are Commuting Areas Relevant for the Delimitation of Administrative Regions in Denmark? Regional Studies, 36, 8, 833−844. <https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000012289>
2. BARTOSIEWICZ, B., PIELESIAK, I. (2019): Spatial patterns of travel behaviour in Poland. Travel Behaviour and Society, 15, 113−122. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.01.004>
3. BONTJE, M. (2001): Dealing with Deconcentration: Population Deconcentration and Planning Response in Polynucleated Urban Regions in North-west Europe. Urban Studies, 38, 4, 769−785. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035330>
4. CAIRNS, S., HARMER, C., HOPKIN, J., SKIPPON, S. (2014): Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities: A review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 63, 107−117. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.010>
5. CHEN, C., MA, J., SUSILO, Y., LIU, Y., WANG, M. (2016): The promises of big data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 68, 285−299. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.04.005>
6. CHOUDHURY, P. (2022): Geographic Mobility, Immobility, and Geographic Flexibility: A Review and Agenda for Research on the Changing Geography of Work. Academy of Management Annals, 16, 1. <https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0242>
7. DAISY, N., HAFEZI, M., LIU, L., MILLWARD, H. (2018): Understanding and Modeling the Activity-Travel Behavior of University Commuters at a Large Canadian University. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144, 2. <https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000442>
8. DELBOSC, A., MCDONALD, N., STOKES, G., LUCAS, K., CIRCELLA, G., LEE, Y. (2019): Millennials in cities: Comparing travel behaviour trends across six case study regions. Cities, 90, 1−14. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.023>
9. DIJST, M., RIETVELD, P., STEG, L., VELDSTRA, J., VERHOEF, E. (2023): Individual needs, opportunities and travel behaviour: A multidisciplinary perspective based on psychology, economics and geography. In: Van Wee, B., Annema, J.A., Banister, D., Pudane, B. (eds.): The Transport System and Transport Policy: An Introduction, second edition, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 17−49.
10. ELDEEB, G., MOHAMED, M., PÁEZ, A. (2021): Built for active travel? Investigating the contextual effects of the built environment on transportation mode choice. Journal of Transport Geography, 96, 103158. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103158>
11. FARBER, S., PÁEZ, A. (2009): My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation. Journal of Transport Geography, 17, 3, 216−225. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.07.008>
12. GARCIA-LÓPEZ, M.A., PASIDIS, I., VILADECANS-MARSAL, E. (2024): Suburbanization and transportation in European cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 24, 6, 843−869. <https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbae029>
13. GARCIA-SIERRA, M., VAN DEN BERGH, J., MIRALLES-GUASCH, C. (2015): Behavioural economics, travel behaviour and environmental-transport policy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 41, 288−305. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.023>
14. GORNÝ, D. (2024): Active commuting as a form of sustainable urban mobility: The case of the Brno Metropolitan Area. Moravian Geographical Reports, 32, 3, 152−163. <https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2024-0013>
15. HAMPL, M., MARADA, M. (2015): Sociogeografická regionalizace Česka. Geografie, 120, 3, 397−421. <https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120030397>
16. HALÁS, M., BLAŽEK, V., KLAPKA, P., KRAFT, S. (2021): Population movements based on mobile phone location data: the Czech Republic. Journal of Maps, 17, 1, 166−122. <https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1937730>
17. HALÁS, M., KLAPKA, P. (2024): Aktualizácia vymedzenia funkčných regiónov Slovenska: hierarchia, neurčitosť a využiteľnosť. Geografický časopis, 76, 2, 141−163. <https://doi.org/10.31577/geogrcas.2024.76.2.08>
18. HAUSTEIN, S., NIELSEN, T. (2016): European mobility cultures: A survey-based cluster analysis across 28 European countries. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 173−180. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.014>
19. HORŇÁK, M., KRAFT, S. (2015): Functional Transport Regions in Slovakia defined by Passenger-car Traffic Flows. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 157, 109−128. <https://doi.org/10.1553/moegg157s109>
20. HORŇÁK, M., HLUŠKO, R., ROCHOVSKÁ, A., LELKESOVÁ, V. (2023): Public transport accessibility and spatial exclusion in Roma settlements: A case study of three regions in Eastern Slovakia. Moravian Geographical Reports, 31, 1, 27−38. <https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2023-0003>
21. IVAN, I., HORÁK, J., ZAJÍČKOVÁ, L, BURIAN, J., FOJTÍK, D. (2019): Factors influencing walking distance to the preferred public transport stop in selected urban centres of Czechia. GeoScape, 13, 1, 16−30. <https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2019-0002>
22. JAROŠ, V. (2017): Social and transport exclusion. Geographia Polonica, 90, 3, 247−263. <https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0099>
23. KAMRUZZAMAN, M., HINE, J., GUNAY, B., BLAIR, N. (2011): Using GIS to visualise and evaluate student travel behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1, 13−32. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.004>
24. KLAPKA, P., KRAFT, S., HALÁS, M. (2020): Network based definition of functional regions: a graph theory approach for spatial distribution of traffic flows. Journal of Transport Geography, 102855. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102855>
25. KRAFT, S., PRENER, J. (2014): Spatial aspects of travel behaviour in the Czech Republic after 1989. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Geographica, 45, 2, 53−77.
26. KRAFT, S., HALÁS, M., VANČURA, M. (2014): The delimitation of urban hinterlands based on transport flows: A case study of regional capitals in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22, 1, 24−32. <https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2014-0003>
27. KRAFT, S., HALÁS, M., KLAPKA, P., BLAŽEK, V. (2022): Functional regions as a platform to define integrated transport system zones: The use of population flows data. Applied Geography, 144, 102732. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102732>
28. KRAFT, S., BLAŽEK, V., MARADA, M. (2022): Exploring the daily mobility rhythms in an urban environment: Using the data from intelligent transport systems. Geografie, 127, 127−144. <https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2022.004>
29. KRAFT, S., MARADA, M., PETŘÍČEK, J., BLAŽEK, V., KROVOVÁ, A. (2024): Even a Journey Can Be a Destination: Exploring the Spatial Patterns of Motorcycle Traffic in the Czech Republic Based on Official and Crowdsourced Data. Travel Behaviour and Society, 37, 100860. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100860>
30. KRAUSE, C., ZHANG, L. (2019): Short-term travel behavior prediction with GPS, land use, and point of interest data. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 123, 349−361. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.06.012>
31. KVĚTOŇ, V., CHMELÍK, J., VONDRÁČKOVÁ, P., MARADA, M. (2012): Developments in the public transport serviceability of rural settlements with examples from various types of micro-regions. AUC–Geographica, 47, 1, 51−63. <https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2015.24>
32. LIU, J., WANG, C., ZHANG, T., QIAO, H. (2023): Delineating the Effects of Social Media Marketing Activities on Generation Z Travel Behaviors. Journal of Travel Research, 62, 5, 1140−1158. <https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221106394>
33. MARADA, M., KVĚTOŇ, V. (2010): Diferenciace nabídky dopravních příležitostí v českých obcích a sociogeografických mikroregionech. Geografie, 110, 1, 21−43. <https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2010115010021>
34. MARADA, M., KVĚTOŇ, V., MATTERN, T., ŠTYCH, P., HUDEČEK, T. (2013): Accessibility patterns: Czech Republic Case Study. Europa XXI, 24, 61−76. <https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.24.5>
35. MARADA, M., KVĚTOŇ, V. (2016): Transport Supply and Demand Changes in Relation to Unemployment: Empirical Evidence from the Czech Republic in a Time of Crisis. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 107, 5, 611−627. <https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12186>
36. MARADA, M., ZÉVL, J.J., PETŘÍČEK, J., BLAŽEK, V. (2023): Interurban mobility: Eurythmic relations among metropolitan cities monitored by mobile phone data. Applied Geography, 156. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102998>
37. MARTÍN, B., PÁEZ, A. (2019): Individual and geographic variations in the propensity to travel by active modes in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. Journal of Transport Geography, 76, 103−113. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.005>
38. PILEČEK, J., CHROMÝ, P., JANČÁK, V. (2013): Social Capital and Local Socio‐economic Development: The Case of Czech Peripheries. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 104, 604−620. <https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12053>
39. PUCHER, J., BUEHLER, R. (2005): Transport Policy in Post-Communist Europe. In: Button, K.J., Hensher, D.A. (eds.): Handbook of Transport Strategy, Policy and Institutions 6, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, 725−743. <https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080456041-042>
40. SEIDENGLANZ, D. (2007): Dopravní charakteristiky venkovského prostoru. Dissertation thesis. Masaryk University, Faculty of Science, Institute of Geography.
41. SEIDENGLANZ, D. (2010): Transport relations among settlement centres in the eastern part of the Czech Republic as a potential for polycentricity. AUC-Geographica, 45, 1, 75−89. <https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2015.58>
42. SEIDENGLANZ, D., NIGRIN, T., DUJKA, J. (2015): Regional railway transport in Czech, Austrian and German decentralised and regionalised transport markets. Review of Economic Perspectives, 15, 4, 431−450. <https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0029>
43. SEIDENGLANZ, D., TACZANOWSKI, J., KRÓL, M., HORŇÁK, M., NIGRTIN, T. (2021): Quo vadis, international long-distance railway services? Evidence from Central Europe. Journal of Transport Geography 92, 102998. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102998>
44. SOHN, J. (2005): Are Commuting Patterns a Good Indicator of Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Transport geography, 13, 4, 306−317. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.005>
45. ŠIMEČEK, M., GABRHEL, V., TÖGEL, M., LAZOR, M. (2018): Travel behaviour of seniors in Eastern Europe: a comparative study of Brno and Bratislava. European Transport Research Review, 10, 16. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-018-0286-8>
46. ŠŤASTNÁ, M., VAISHAR, A., STONAWSKÁ, K. (2015): Integrated Transport System of the South-Moravian Region and its impact on rural development. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, 53−64. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.012>
47. TACZANOWSKI, J. (2015): The Effects of Liberalisation of the Passenger Railway Market on the Situation of Regional Rail Connections in Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria. Review of Economic Perspectives, 15, 3, 249−268. <https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0019>
48. TAGAI, G., BERNARD, J., ŠIMON, M., KOÓS, B. (2018): Two faces of peripherality: labour markets, poverty, and population dynamics in Hungary and Czechia. Regional Statistics, 8, 2, 19−45. <https://doi.org/10.15196/RS080204>
49. TONEV, P. (2013): Změny v dojížďce za prací v období transformace: komparace lokálních trhů práce. Dissertation thesis. Masaryk University, Faculty of Science, Institute of Geography.
50. TRANSPORT YEARBOOK (2023): Transport yearbook Czech Republic. Ministry of Transport. https://www.sydos.cz/cs/rocenka-2023/index.html
51. VAN ACKER, V., VAN WEE, B., WITLOX, F. (2010): When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour. Transport Reviews, 30, 2, 219−240. <https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640902943453>
52. WOLNY, A. (2019): Are suburban commuters confined to private transport? A case study of a medium-sized functional urban area (FUA) in Poland. Cities, 92, 82−96. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.013>
53. ZÉVL, J.J., OUŘEDNÍČEK, M. (2024): Suburban Autonomy? The Case of Inter-Suburban Commuting Outside Prague. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. <https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12652>
front cover

ISSN 1212-0014 (Print) ISSN 2571-421X (Online)

Archive