Geografie 2024, 129, 91-118

https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2024.002

Comparison of the integration policies of selected European countries concerning holders of international protection

Alena Pařízková1ID, Tomáš Hirt2ID, Viktor Rumpík2ID, Alena Glajchová1ID, Karel Řezáč1ID, Jan Pěchota3ID

1University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Arts, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Plzeň, Czechia
2University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Arts, Department of Anthropology, Plzeň, Czechia
3University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Arts, Department of Middle East Studies, Plzeň, Czechia

Received February 2023
Accepted January 2024

References

1. BRAUN, V., CLARKE, V. (2006): Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 77−101. <https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa>
2. CEBOLLA-BOADO, H., FINOTELLI, C. (2015): Is There a North–South Divide in Integration Outcomes? A Comparison of the Integration Outcomes of Immigrants in Southern and Northern Europe. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 31, 1, 77−102. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-014-9327-8>
3. DRYDEN-PETERSON, S. (2016): Refugee Education: The Crossroads of Globalization. Educational Researcher, 45, 9, 473−482. <https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16683398>
4. ESSER, H. (2000): Soziologie, spezielle grundlagen. Gand 2: die konstruktion der gesellschaft. Campus verlag, Frankfurt/New York.
5. GILODI, A. ALBERT, I., NIENABER, B. (2022): Vulnerability in the Context of Migration: a Critical Overview and a New Conceptual Model. Human Arenas, 2022, 1−22. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00288-5>
6. GOODMAN, S. W. (2015): Conceptualizing and Measuring Citizenship and Integration Policy: Past Lessons and New Approaches. Comparative Political Studies, 48, 14, 1905−1941. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015592648>
7. GREGUROVIĆ, S., ŽUPARIĆ-ILJIĆ, D. (2018): Comparing the Incomparable? Migrant Integration Policies and Perplexities of Comparison. International Migration, 56, 3, 105−122. <https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12435>
8. HAM, S., YANG, K. (2022): The Impact of Anti-discrimination Policies on Immigrant Youths’ Sense of National Belonging: An Institutionalist Account. Policy Studies, 43, 4, 821−837. <https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1782869>
9. KLARENBEEK, L. M. (2021): Reconceptualising ‘Integration as a Two-way Process’. Migration Studies, 9, 3, 902−921. <https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz033>
10. PLATT, L., POLAVIEJA, J., RADL, J. (2022): Which Integration Policies Work? The Heterogeneous Impact of National Institutions on Immigrants’ Labor Market Attainment in Europe. International Migration Review, 56, 2, 344−375. <https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211032677>
11. RÁKOCZYOVÁ, M., POŘÍZKOVÁ, H. (2009): Sociální integrace přistěhovalců – teoretická východiska výzkumu. In: Rákoczyová, M., Trbola, R. (eds.): Sociální integrace přistěhovalců v České republice. SLON, Praha, 23−34.
12. UHNCR (2018): Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, https://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10 (13. 2. 2023).
13. YANG, K., HAM, S. (2017): Truancy as Systemic Discrimination: Anti-discrimination Legislation and its Effect on School Attendance among Immigrant Children. The Social Science Journal, 54, 2, 216−226. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2017.02.001>
14. ZOGATA KUSZ, A. (2020): Immigration and integration policies in Czechia: a new immigration destination country in the EU. In: Duszczyk, M., Pachocka, M., Pszczółkowska, D. (eds.): Relations between immigration and integration policies in Europe. Challenges, Opportunities and Perspectives in Selected EU Member States. Routledge, London/New York, 173−196.
15. Action Plan for Integration and Inclusion 2021−2027. European Commission, EU, https://homeaffairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/legal-migration-and-integration/integration/action-plan-integration-and-inclusion_en (10. 2. 2023).
16. EC (2020): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Action plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021−2027, European Commision, https://ec.europa.eu/migrantintegration/sites/default/files/2020-11/ActionPlanonIntegrationandInclusion2021-2027.pdf (10. 2. 2023).
18. EU (2004): Common basic principles for immigrant integration policy in the EU. Press release, https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/common-basic-principles-immigrant-integration-policy-eu_en (6. 6. 2022).
19. INFORMATION SVERIGE (2022): Integration in Sveden, https://www.informationsverige.se/en/jag-har-fatt-uppehallstillstand/samhallsorientering/boken-om-sverige/att-komma-tillsverige/integration-i-sverige/ (12. 11. 2022).
20. KOTOUTUMINEN.FI (2021a): Integration and reception of refugees, https://kotoutuminen.fi/en/integration-and-refugee-reception (10. 2. 2023).
21. KOTOUTUMINEN.FI (2021b): Initial assessment, https://kotoutuminen.fi/en/initial-assessment (10. 2. 2023).
22. MV (2023): Integrace cizinců. Ministerstvo vnitra ČR, https://www.mvcr.cz/migrace/clanek/integrace-cizincu.aspx?q=Y2hudW09Mg%3D%3D (8. 10. 2022).
23. SERVICE-PUBLIC (2021): Qu’est-ce que le contrat d’intégration républicaine (CIR), https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F17048 (10. 2. 2023).
24. USNESENÍ VLÁDY ČR (2022): Postup při realizaci aktualizované Koncepce integrace cizinců. Ve vzájemném respektu 2022, https://www.mvcr.cz/migrace/soubor/2022-postup-pri-realizaci-kic-2022-usneseni-vlady-c-40-2022-pdf.aspx (8. 10. 2023).
front cover

ISSN 1212-0014 (Print) ISSN 2571-421X (Online)

Archive