Geografie 2023, 128, 271-299
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2023.014
The admission of Ukrainian refugees from the perspective of municipalities in Czechia
Marie Jelínková1
, František Ochrana1, Michal Plaček2
, František Ochrana1, Michal Plaček2
1Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Sociological Studies, Department of Public and Social Policy, Prague, Czechia
2National Museum of Agriculture, Prague, Czechia
Received November 2022
Accepted April 2023
References
1. ADSERÀ, A., ANDERSEN, S., TØNNESSEN, M. (2022): Does One Municipality Fit All? The Employment of Refugees in Norway Across Municipalities of Different Centrality and Size. European Journal of Population, 38, 3, 547−575.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09618-3>
2. ARORA-JONSSON, S., LARSSON, O. (2021): Lives in limbo: Migrant integration and rural governance in Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 19−28.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.010>
3. BLANK, M. (2019): „Wir Schaffen Das!“? Spatial Pitfalls of Neighborhood-Based Refugee Reception in Germany-A Case Study of Frankfurt-Rodelheim. Social Sciences Basel. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 161.
<https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050161>
4. BÖRZEL, T. A., RISSE, T. (2018): From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 1, 83−108.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281>
5. BOTELHO, F., BOGDAN, L., POWER, S. A. (2022): Re-engaging cultural differences: Culture, morality, trauma and the integration of non-Western migrants. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48, 101454.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101454>
6. BRUBAKER, R. (1992): Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
<https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028944>
7. CAPPIALI, T. M. (2019): How do local actors promote civic participation of immigrants? In Caponio, T., Scholten, P., Zapata-Barrero, R. (eds.): The Routledge handbook of the governance of migration and diversity in cities. Routledge.
<https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351108478-12>
8. CASTLES, S. (2004): The Factors that Make and Unmake Migration Policies. International Migration Review, 38, 3, 852−884.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00222.x>
9. CASTLES, S. (2003): Towards a Sociology of Forced Migration and Social Transformation. Sociology. The Journal of the British Sociological Association. 37, 1, 13−34.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037001384>
10. CLARK, K., GARRATT, L., LI, Y., LYMPEROPOULOU, K., SHANKLEY, W. (2019): Local deprivation and the labour market integration of new migrants to England. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45, 17, 3260−3282.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1481000>
11. COLIC-PEISKER, V., TILBURY, F. (2007): Integration into the Australian Labour Market: The Experience of Three „Visibly Different“ Groups of Recently Arrived Refugees. International Migration, 45, 1, 59−85.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00396.x>
12. CZAIKA, M., DE HAAS, H. (2013): The Effectiveness of Immigration Policies. Population and Development Review, 39, 3, 487−508.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00613.x>
13. ČERMÁK, Z., JANSKÁ, E. (2011): Distribution and migration of foreigners as a part of the sociogeographical differentiation of Czechia. Geografie, 116, 4, 422−439.
<https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2011116040422>
14. ČERYCHOVÁ, P., KALÍKOVÁ, S., VALENTOVÁ, E., POSPÍŠIL, F., VALENTA, O. (2020): Analýza situace v oblasti integrace migrantů s důrazem na její regionální a lokální rovinu. Sdružení pro integraci a migraci, Praha.
15. ČSÚ. (2022): R04 Cizinci v ČR podle státního občanství v letech 1994−2021. Český statistický úřad.
16. , A. (2017): Standortsuche für die Flüchtlingsunterbringung Die Entwicklung von Standortkriterien für Gemeinschaftsunterkünfte. Sozialmagazin, 42, 9−10, 28−35.
17. DRAUDE, A., BÖRZEL, T. A., RISSE, T. (ed.) (2018): The Oxford Handbook of Governance and Limited Statehood. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198797203.001.0001>
18. DRBOHLAV, D. (2003): Immigration and the Czech Republic (with a Special Focus on the Foreign Labor Force). International Migration Review. 37, 1,194−224.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00134.x>
19. DRBOHLAV, D. (2008): Nelegální ekonomické aktivity migrantů: Česko v evropském kontextu. Karolinum, Praha.
20. DRBOHLAV, D. (ed.) (2015): Ukrajinská pracovní migrace v Česku: Migrace – remitence – (rozvoj). Karolinum, Praha.
21. DUCHOŇOVÁ, K. (2020): Psychosocial care of immigrants in the Czech Republic as a country in transition. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 216, 3, 163−164.
<https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.276>
22. DUSZCZYK, M., KACZMARCZYK, P. (2022): The War in Ukraine and Migration to Poland: Outlook and Challenges. Intereconomics, 57, 3, 164−170.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-022-1053-6>
23. , P. (2012): Mateřství na dálku. Transnacionální mateřství ukrajinských migrantek v České republice. Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, 1, 13, 24−32.
24. FAIST, T. (2000): Transnationalization in international migration: Implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 2, 189−222.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/014198700329024>
25. FARBOTKO, C., LAZRUS, H. (2012): The first climate refugees? Contesting global narratives of climate change in Tuvalu. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions. 22, 2, 382−390.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.014>
26. FILSINGER, D. (2018): Entwicklung, Konzepte und Strategien der kommunalen Integrationspolitik. In Gesemann, F., Roth, R. (eds.): Handbuch Lokale Integrationspolitik. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 315−343.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13409-9_13>
27. FREIDINGEROVÁ, T., NOVÁKOVÁ, B. (2021): Vietnamese business enclaves on Czech-German speaking borders: Intricate network of ethnic economies or conglomerate of individual enterprises? In Chlopčík, T. (ed.): Opportunities and Threats to Current Business Management in Cross-border Comparison, GUC – Verlag der Gesellschaft für Unternehmensrechnung und Controlling m.b.H., 36−58.
28. GEDDES, A. (2019): Introduction: The dynamics of regional migration governance. In: Geddes, A., Vera Espinoza, M., Hadj Abdou, L., Brumat, L. (eds.): The Dynamics of Regional Migration Governance, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenhalm, 1−14.
<https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119948.00006>
29. GLORIUS, B. (2021): Diversity Development in Postsocialist Cities: The Example of East Germany. Geographical Review, 111, 2, 233−251.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2020.1759065>
30. GOLDRING, L., BERINSTEIN, C., BERNHARD, J. K. (2009): Institutionalizing precarious migratory status in Canada. Citizenship Studies, 13, 3, 239−265.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020902850643>
31. HROMADA, E., HROMADA, E. (2021): Financial Unavailability of Housing in the Czech Republic and Recommendations for its Solution. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 10, 2, 47−57.
<https://doi.org/10.52950/ES.2021.10.2.003>
32. HUNGER, U., KERSTING, N. (2019): Coping with the Challenges of Mass Migration: Reception, Distribution and Integration of Refugees in German Municipalities since 2015. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 19, 3, 407−430.
<https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.19.3.3>
33. IOM (2022): Průzkum o situaci, potřebách a záměrech uprchlíků. Mezinárodní organizace pro migraci, https://czechia.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl136/files/press_release/file/IOM_DTM_CZE_Surveys_UKR%20response_Jun-July%202022%20cs_1.pdf (17. 8. 2022).
34. JANSKÁ, E., BERNARD, J. (2015): What shapes the concentration/deconcentration processes? The factors influencing internal migration of immigrants in Czechia. Geografie, 120, 4, 585−602.
<https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120040585>
35. JELÍNKOVÁ, M. (ed.) (2023): Local migrant integration policies and their structural mechanisms: A comparative study of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany and Belgium. Karolinum, Praha (v tisku).
36. JELÍNKOVÁ M., HRONEK J. (2022): Dopady uprchlické krize na města a obce ČR: výsledky dotazníkového šetření z června 2022, Svaz měst a obcí České republiky.
37. JIRKA, L. (2021): Ukrajinská migrace do České republiky a její proměny v období epidemie covid-19. Lidé a města, 23, 3, 331−352.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/12128112.2376>
38. JORGENSEN, M. B. (2012): The Diverging Logics of Integration Policy Making at National and City Level. International Migration Review, 46, 1, 244−278.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2012.00886.x>
39. KAISER, L. (ed .). (2018): Soziale Sicherung im Umbruch: Transdisziplinäre Ansätze für soziale Herausforderungen unserer Zeit. Springer VS.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06502-7>
40. KERSTING, N. (2018): Migracija i integracija u njemačkim gradovima. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 18, 2, 201−222.
<https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.18.2.6>
41. KIC (2006): Koncepce integrace cizinců 2006. Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, file:///D:/Downloads/KIC_2006_a_Postup_pri_realizaci_KIC-2006_-_usneseni_vlady-_c_126−2006%20(1).pdf (26. 5. 2023).
42. KIC (2011): Koncepce integrace cizinců 2011 – Společné soužití. Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, file:///D:/Downloads/KIC_2011_a_Postup_pri_realizaci_KIC-2011_-_usneseni_vlady_c_99−2011.pdf (26. 5. 2023).
43. KIC (2016): Koncepce integrace cizinců 2016 – Ve vzájemném respektu. Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, file:///D:/Downloads/KIC_2016_a_Postup_pri_realizaci_KIC-2016_-_usneseni_vlady_c_26−2016.pdf (26. 5. 2023).
44. KIRMAYER, L. J., NARASIAH, L., MUNOZ, M., RASHID, M., RYDER, A. G., GUZDER, J., HASSAN, G., ROUSSEAU, C., POTTIE, K. (2011): Common mental health problems in immigrants and refugees: General approach in primary care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183, 12, E959−E967.
<https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090292>
45. KNEFEL, M., KANTOR, V., WEINDL, D., SCHIESS-JOKANOVIC, J., NICHOLSON, A. A., VERGINER, L., SCHÄFER, I., LUEGER-SCHUSTER, B. (2022): A brief transdiagnostic psychological intervention for Afghan asylum seekers and refugees in Austria: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 13, 1, 2068911.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2022.2068911>
46. KUHN, T. S., HACKING, I. (2012): The structure of scientific revolutions (Fourth edition). The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
<https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001>
47. LAVENEX, S. (2018): Migration. In A. Draude, T. A. Börzel, & T. Risse (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance and Limited Statehood, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 519−540.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198797203.013.25>
48. LAVENEX, S., PIPER, N. (2022): Regions and global migration governance: Perspectives ‘from above’, ‘from below’ and ‘from beyond’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48, 12, 2837−2854.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1972564>
49. LUTHRA, R., PLATT, L., SALAMOŃSKA, J. (2018): Types of Migration: The Motivations, Composition, and Early Integration Patterns of “New Migrants” in Europe. International Migration Review, 52, 2, 368−403.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12293>
50. LYNNEBAKKE, B., AASLAND, A. (2022): Striking roots: Place attachment of international migrants, internal migrants and local natives in three Norwegian rural municipalities. Journal of Rural Studies, 94, 488−498.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.021>
51. MOTTE-BAUMVOL, J., MONT’ALVERNE, T. C. F., GUIMARÃES BRAGA, G. (2022): Extending Social Protection for Migrants Under the European Union’s Temporary Protection Directive: Lessons from the War in Ukraine. SSRN Electronic Journal.
<https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4096325>
52. MPSV (2022): České předsednictví v Radě Evropské unie. https://www.mpsv.cz/czpres (15. 3. 2023).
53. MÜNICH, D., PROTIVÍNSKÝ, T. (2023): Vývoj postojů české veřejnosti k válečným uprchlíkům z Ukrajiny, https://idea.cerge-ei.cz/studies/vyvoj-postoju-ceske-verejnosti-k-valecnym-uprchlikum-z-ukrajiny (1. 3. 2023).
54. MV ČR (2022): Statistika v souvislosti s válkou na Ukrajině, listopad 2022. Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky. https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/statistika-v-souvislosti-s-valkou-na-ukrajine-ARCHIV.ASPX (11. 11. 2022).
55. NEKORJAK, M. (2006): Klientský systém a ukrajinská pracovní migrace do České republiky. Sociální studia, 2006, 1, 89−109.
<https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2006-1-89>
56. OCHRANA, F. (2013): Metodologie vědy. Úvod do problému. Karolinum, Praha.
57. OCHRANA, F. (2022): Historical-evolutionary and Retrograde Approach to the Study of Social Phenomena and Public Administration. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14, 2, 1−24.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0011>
58. PAQ RESEARCH (2022a): Hlas Ukrajinců: Pracovní uplatnění, dovednosti a kvalifikace uprchlíků / Výzkum mezi uprchlíky. https://www.paqresearch.cz/post/prace-ukrajinskych-uprchliku-v-cesku (6. 9. 2022).
59. PAQ RESEARCH (2022b): Hlas Ukrajinců: Zkušenosti uprchlíků s bydlením v Česku a výhled do budoucna. Výzkum mezi uprchlíky, https://www.paqresearch.cz/post/ubytovani-ukrajinskych-uprchliku-v-cesku (2. 8. 2022).
60. PAQ RESEARCH, České priority (2022): Bydlení, trh práce, vzdělávání: Jak postupovat v integraci ukrajinských uprchlíků v ČR 2022, https://www.paqresearch.cz/post/integrace-ukrajinskych-uprchl%C3%ADku-v-cr-2022 (24. 3. 2023).
61. PENNINX, R. (2019): Problems of and solutions for the study of immigrant integration. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1, 1−13.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0122-x>
62. PLAČEK, M., ŠPAČEK, D., OCHRANA, F. (2020): Public leadership and strategies of Czech municipalities during the COVID-19 pandemic – municipal activism vs municipal passivism. International Journal of Public Leadership, 17, 1, 108−117.
<https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-06-2020-0047>
63. POPPER, K. R. (1997): Logika vědeckého zkoumání. OIKOYMENH, Praha.
64. MV ČR (2016): Postup při realizaci aktualizované Koncepce integrace cizinců v roce 2016. Usnesení vlády ČR ze dne 26. ledna 2022 č. 40. Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Praha.
65. , V., BRIZGAN, I., CHEVHANOVA, V., SVISTUN, L., HRYHORYEVA, O. (2020): Impact of forced migration on the sustainable development of rural territories. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6, 4, 481−496.
66. SCHINKEL, W. (2018): Against ‘immigrant integration’: For an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies, 6, 1, 31.
<https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1>
67. SCHOLTEN, P., PENNINX, R. (2016): The Multilevel Governance of Migration and Integration. In: Garcés-Mascareñas, B., Penninx, R. (eds.): Integration Processes and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, Springer International Publishing, New York City, 91−108.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21674-4_6>
68. SCHOLTEN, P. (2013): Agenda dynamics and the multi-level governance of intractable policy controversies: The case of migrant integration policies in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 46, 3, 217−236.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9170-x>
69. SCHEWEITZER, R., MELVILLE, F., STEEL, Z., LACHAREZ, P. (2006): Trauma, post-migration living difficulties, and social support as predictors of psychological adjustment in resettled Sudanese refugees. 40, 2, 179−187.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01766.x>
70. ŚLĘZAK, E., BIELEWSKA, A. (2022): Cities’ migration policies in a country with a deficit of migration policy. The case of Poland. International Migration, 60, 3, 173−187.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12907>
71. TRAUNER, F. (2016): Asylum policy: The EU’s ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure. Journal of European Integration, 38, 3, 311−325.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1140756>
72. UNHCR (2023): Ukraine Refugee situation. Úřad vysokého komisaře pro uprchlíky, https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine (26. 5. 2023).
73. ZOGATA-KUSZ, A. (2020): Immigration and integration policies in Czechia. In Duszczyk, M., Pachocka, M., Pszczółkowska, D., Relations between Immigration and Integration Policies in Europe. Routledge, 173−176.
<https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429263736-10>
