Geografie 2021, 126, 97-122
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2021126010097
Human and demographic capital in peripheries of the Pilsen Region, Czechia
Jan Kubeš
, Nikola Podlešáková
, Nikola Podlešáková
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Education, Department of Geography, České Budějovice, Czechia
Received January 2020
Accepted June 2020
References
1. , S., RAHMAN, S., ERRINGTON, A. (2009): Measuring the determinants of relative economic performance of rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 3, 309–321.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.02.003>
2. , J. (2005): Suburban and peripheral rural areas in Poland: the balance of development in the transformation period. Geografický časopis, 57, 2, 117–130.
3. BECKER, G. (1994): Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. , J. (2011): Endogenní rozvojové potenciály malých venkovských obcí – obtížné hledání a měření jejich vlivu. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 47, 4, 745–775.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2011.47.4.06>
5. , J., ŠIMON, M. (2017): Vnitřní periferie v Česku: Multidimenzionalita sociálního vyloučení ve venkovských oblastech. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 53, 1, 3–28.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2017.53.1.299>
6. , A., LEROY, P. (1994): Power, politics and environmental inequality: a theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of ‘peripheralisation’. Environmental politics, 3, 2, 197–228.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019408414139>
7. , T., LE GRAND, J., PIACHAUD, D. (1999): Social exclusion in Britain 1991–1995. Social Policy and Administration, 33, 3, 227–244.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00148>
8. , J. S. (1988): Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
<https://doi.org/10.1086/228943>
9. , P. (2004): Poverty and social exclusion in rural areas: characteristics, processes and research issues. Sociologia Ruralis, 44, 1, 60–75.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00262.x>
10. , A. K. (2001): From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies, 9, 4, 539–552.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120049899>
11. , K., BAŃSKI, J., GÓRCZYŃSKA, M. (2016): The impact of location on the role of small towns in regional development: Mazovia, Poland. European Countryside, 8, 4, 413–426.
<https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0028>
12. ČSÚ (2020): Regionální data ve Veřejné databázi. Český statistický úřad v Praze, https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/regionalni-data-ve-verejne-databazi (20. 12. 2020).
13. , J., HAVLÍČEK, T. (2002): Border and border region: theoretical aspects, identification and determination. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica, 36, 1, 27–44.
14. , P., HAMPL, M. (2002): Metropolitan areas in transformation of regional organization in the Czech Republic. AUC Geographica, 37, 2, 133–155.
15. , E. (2011): Geographical location of depopulation areas in the Czech Republic and its dependence on transport infrastructure: Part I: Definition, methodology, and quantitative analysis. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 4, 1, 31–40.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/V10158-011-0005-9>
16. EDELMANOVÁ, D. (2019): Populační vývoj a současné migrační tendence venkovských obcí Jižních Čech. Diplomová práce. Karlova Univerzita v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje.
17. , J. (2019): Peripheralization and knowledge bases in Austria: towards a new regional typology. European Planning Studies, 27, 1, 42–67.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1541966>
18. ENYEDI, G. (2005): Processes of regional development in post-socialist Hungary. In: Barta, G., Fekete, E.G., Szörényiné Kukorelli, I., Timár, J. (eds.): Hungarian spaces and places: patterns of transition. Centre for Regional Studies, Pécs, 18–27.
19. FERRÃO, J., LOPES, R. (2004): Understanding peripheral rural areas as contexts for economic development. In: Labrianidis, L. (ed.): The future of Europe’s rural peripheries, Ashgate, Aldershot, 31–61.
20. , H. S., KONTULY, T. (1993): A theoretical foundation for the concept of differential urbanization. International Regional Science Review, 15, 3, 157–177.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769301500202>
21. , S. (1992): Exploiting information and communication technologies for rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 8, 3, 269–278.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(92)90004-P>
22. , M. (2008): Priestorová polarizácia spoločnosti s detailným pohľadom na periférne regióny Slovenska. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 44, 2, 349–369.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.06>
23. , M. (2014): Modelovanie priestorového usporiadania a dichotómie centrum – periféria. Geografie, 119, 4, 384–405.
<https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2014119040384>
24. HAMPL, M. (2005): Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext. Praha, Univerzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje.
25. , M., MARADA, M. (2015): Sociogeografická regionalizace Česka. Geografie, 120, 3, 397–421.
<https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120030397>
26. , H. K., ANER, L. G. (2017): On the location dynamics of highly educated people migrating to peripheral regions of Denmark. Population, Space and Place, 23, 8, 1–12.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2076>
27. , T., CHROMÝ, P., JANČÁK, V., MARADA, M. (2008): Innere und äußere Peripherie am Beispiel Tschechiens. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 150, 299–316.
28. , A. (2018): Linking polycentricity concepts to periphery: implications for an integrative Austrian strategic spatial planning practice. European Planning Studies, 26, 4, 635–652.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1403570>
29. CHRISTALLER, W. (1933): Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Eine ökonomischgeographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmässigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen. Fischer, Jena.
30. , M. K. (1982): A centralized biomedical research data-processing unit and the stages of its developments. Medical Informatics, 7, 1, 39–48.
<https://doi.org/10.3109/14639238209020641>
31. , A., TRIPPL, M. (2017): Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93, 5, 436–457.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443>
32. , M. (2018): The development of peripheral areas: The case of West Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland. Moravian Geographical Reports, 26, 1, 69–81.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018-0006>
33. , N. (2018): Planning strategies and practices in non-core regions: a critical response. European Planning Studies, 26, 2, 365–375.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1361606>
34. , N., LATTEN, J., BONTJE, M. (2018): Human capital migration: A longitudinal perspective. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109, 5, 644–660.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12324>
35. KRUGMAN, P. R. (1991): Geography and trade. MIT press, Cambridge (MA).
36. , J., KEBZA, M. (2018): Geography of socio-economic differentiation of Poland according to subregions in 2002–2014. AUC Geographica, 53, 1, 36–48.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2018.4>
37. , J., KRAFT, S. (2011): Periferní oblasti jižních Čech a jejich sociálně populační stabilita. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 47, 4, 805–830.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2011.47.4.08>
38. KUBEŠ, J., PAHORECKÁ, J. (2000): Obslužná vybavenost, střediskovost a spádovost venkovských sídel. Okresy Písek, Tábor a okolí, rok 1998. In: Kubeš, J. (ed.): Problémy stabilizace venkovského osídlení ČR, Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta, katedra geografie, 61–95.
39. , M. (2015): Small towns in peripheral regions of Germany. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica, 8, 29–38.
40. LABRIANIDIS, L. (2006): Human capital as the critical factor for the development of Europe’s rural peripheral areas. In: de Noronha Vaz, T., Morgan, E. J., Nijkamp, P. (eds.): The new European rurality: strategies for small firms, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, 41–59.
41. LABRIANIDIS, L. (2017): Introduction. In: Labrianidis, L. (ed.): The future of Europe’s rural peripheries, Routledge, 14–30.
42. LEIMGRUBER, W. (2004): Between global and local. Marginality and marginal regions in the context of globalization and deregulation. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot.
43. , A. B. (2013): The experience turn of the Danish periphery: The downscaling of new spatial strategies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20, 4, 460–472.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412441192>
44. , K. (2012): Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013>
45. , W., SAMIR, K. C. (2011): Global human capital: Integrating education and population. Science, 333, 6042, 587–592.
<https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206964>
46. , L., FARRELL, M., MCDONAGH, J. (2016): Perception of marginality and peripherality in an Irish rural context. Quaestiones Geographicae, 35, 4, 93–105.
<https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0037>
47. , J. (2016): Small towns in the context of “borrowed size” and “agglomeration shadow” debates: The case of the South Moravian region (Czech Republic). European Countryside, 8, 4, 333–350.
<https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0024>
48. , M., CHROMÝ, P., JANČÁK, V., HAVLÍČEK, T. (2006): Space polarisation and peripheral regions in Czechia. Europa XXI, 15, 29–34.
49. , P., SIROVÁTKA, T. (2008): Sociální vyloučení (exkluze) a sociální začleňování (inkluze) – koncepty, diskurz, agenda. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 44, 2, 271–294.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.03>
50. , H., HABERSETZER, A., MEILI, R. (2016): Rural-urban linkages and sustainable regional development: The role of entrepreneurs in linking peripheries and centers. Sustainability, 8, 745.
<https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080745>
51. , T. G. (1994): Core-periphery models, regional planning theory, and Appalachian development. The Professional Geographer, 46, 3, 316–331.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00316.x>
52. , J., MÜLLER, J. (2008): Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 44, 2, 321–348.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.05>
53. MUSIL, J. (2017): Urbanization in socialist countries. Routledge, Abingdon.
54. , G., NAGY, E., TIMÁR, J. (2012): The changing meaning of core–periphery relations in a non-metropolitan “urban region” at the Hungarian–Romanian border. DISP-The Planning Review, 48, 2, 93–105.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2012.721613>
55. , M., WRIGHT, G., SMITH, G., DIBBEN, C. (2006): Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1, 169–185.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a37168>
56. , M., KOPP, J. (2010): Migrační trendy v regionu Šumava po roce 1990. Silva Gabreta, 16, 3, 187–206.
57. , M., PREIS, J., KOPP, J., BARTOŠ, M. (2013): Changes in migration to rural regions in the Czech Republic: Position and perspectives. Moravian Geographical Reports, 21, 3, 37–54.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2013-0015>
58. , L., CSACHOVÁ, S., KULLA, M., NESTOROVÁ-DICKÁ, J., PREGI, L. (2016): Development trajectories of small towns in East Slovakia. European Countryside, 8, 4, 373–394.
<https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0026>
59. OECD (1998): Human capital investment: an international comparison. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), Paris.
60. OSTI, G. (2016): The unbalanced welfare of Italian fragile rural areas. In: Grabski-Kieron, U., Mose, I., Reichert-Schick, A., Steinführer, A. (eds.): European rural peripheries revalued: governance, actors, impacts, Lit Verlag dr. W. Hopf, Berlin, 64–87.
61. , M., ŠPAČKOVÁ, P., FEŘTROVÁ, M. (2011): Změny sociálního prostředí a kvality života v depopulačních regionech České republiky. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 47, 4, 777–804.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2011.47.4.07>
62. OUŘEDNÍČEK, M., ŠPAČKOVÁ, P., KLSÁK, A. (2018): Zóny rezidenční suburbanizace v obcích Česka 2016. Specializovaná mapa. Karlova univerzita v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje.
63. , M. D., RICKMAN, D. S., ALI, K., OLFERT, M. R. (2009): Do new economic geography agglomeration shadows underlie current population dynamics across the urban hierarchy? Papers in Regional Science, 88, 2, 445–466.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00211.x>
64. , G. (2001): Patterns of regional inequality in transition economies. European Planning Studies, 9, 3, 359–383.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120037621>
65. , N. J. (2009): The role of experiences in creating and developing intellectual capital. Management Research News, 32, 4, 371–382.
<https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910944317>
66. , M. G., URSO, G. (2016): Peripheral areas: conceptualizations and policies. Introduction and editorial note. Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 6, 1, 1–19.
67. , J. (2011): The role of human capital of representatives of municipal self-government bodies in development of borderland peripheries in Czechia: the case of Volarsko. AUC–Geographica, 46, 2, 95–106.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2015.34>
68. , J., JANČÁK, V. (2011): Theoretical and methodological aspects of the identification and delimitation of peripheral areas. AUC–Geographica, 46, 1, 43–52.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2015.41>
69. -SEREIKIENĖ, G. (2019): Peripheral regions in Lithuania: the results of uneven development. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6, 1, 70–77.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1571437>
70. , J., RAJÉ, F. (2007): Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 3, 151–160.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002>
71. RAAGMAA, G. (2003): Centre-Periphery model explaining the regional development of the informational and transitional society. Conference Paper in 43rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: Peripheries, Centres, and Spatial Development in the New Europe, Jyväskylä (Finland).
72. , D., LITTKE, H. (2016): ‘A one way ticket to the city, please!’ on young women leaving the Swedish peripheral region Västernorrland. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 1, 301–310.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.05.003>
73. , P. (2014): The selective migration of young graduates: Which of them return to their rural home region and which do not? Journal of Rural Studies, 35, 123–132.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.009>
74. , K., HURBÁNEK, P. (2013): Internet availability as an indicator of peripherality in Slovakia. Moravian Geographical Reports, 21, 1, 16–24.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2013-0002>
75. , I., MASIK, G. (2014): Economic resilience. The case study of Pomorskie region. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 72, 2, 153–164.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-013-0266-3>
76. , K., STRIJKER, D., BOSWORTH, G. (2017): Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001>
77. , T. W. (1961): Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51, 1, 1–17.
78. , J. F. (2016): Rural-urban differences in bonding and bridging social capital. Regional Studies, 50, 3, 391–410.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.918945>
79. , A., HUSCHKA, D., HABICH, R. (2006): Quality of life in rural areas: processes of divergence and convergence. Social Indicators Research, 83, 2, 283–307.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9057-3>
80. , M. (2013): Multidimensional social exclusion and the ‘Rural-Urban Divide’ in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Sociologia Ruralis, 53, 2, 139–157.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12008>
81. STEINFÜHRER, A., REICHERT-SCHICK, A., MOSE, I., GRABSKI-KIERON, U. (2016): European rural peripheries revalued? Introduction to this volume. In: Grabski-Kieron, U., Mose, I., Reichert-Schick, A., Steinführer, A. (eds.): European rural peripheries revalued: governance, actors, impacts, Lit Verlag dr. W. Hopf, Berlin, 2–27.
82. STEWART, S. I. (2002): Amenity migration. In: Luft, K., MacDonald, S. (eds.): Trends 2000: Shaping the future: 5th outdoor recreation & tourism trends symposium, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 369–378.
83. , T. (2009): The old and the new in the geographical pattern of the Polish transition. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis – Geographica, 40, 1, 5–24.
84. , G., SØRENSEN, J. F. (2006): The socioeconomic power of social capital. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26, 9–10, 411–429.
<https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330610690550>
85. , L., MULÍČEK, O. (2009): The micro-regional nature of functional urban areas (FUAs): lessons from the analysis of the Czech urban and regional system. Urban Research & Practice, 2, 3, 287–307.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060903319228>
86. , L., MULÍČEK, O. (2017): Territorial arrangements of small and medium-sized towns from a functional-spatial perspective. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108, 4, 438–455.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12249>
87. , M. (2014): Exploring counterurbanisation in a post‐socialist context: Case of the Czech Republic. Sociologia Ruralis, 54, 2, 117–142.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00576.x>
88. , M. (2017): Multi-scalar geographies of polarisation and peripheralisation: A case study of Czechia. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 37, 125–137.
<https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0029>
89. , J. D., PAASCH, K., CARVER, K. (1997): Social capital and the generation of human capital. Social forces, 75, 4, 1343–1359.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2580674>
90. TONEV, P., HALÁS, M., KLAPKA, P. (2018): Prostorová neurčitost funkčních regionů: porovnání pracovní dojížďky v letech 1991–2011. In: Klímová, V., Žítek, V. (eds.): XXI. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách. Masarykova univerzita, Brno, 285–292.
91. , D. (1991): The planning of rural settlement in Romania. Geographical Journal, 157, 3, 251–264.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/635500>
92. , A. (2004): Small towns: an important part of the Moravian settlement system. Dela, 21, 309–317.
<https://doi.org/10.4312/dela.21.26.309-317>
93. , A., DVOŘÁK, P., HUBAČÍKOVÁ, V., ZAPLETALOVÁ, J. (2013): Contemporary development of peripheral parts of the Czech-Polish borderland: case study of the Javorník area. Geographia Polonica, 86, 3, 237–253.
<https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2013.21>
94. , A., ZAPLETALOVÁ, J. (2009): Small towns as centres of rural micro-regions. European Countryside, 1, 2, 70–81.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-009-0006-4>
95. , P. (2012): Lidský a sociální kapitál vnitřních periferií Česka: příklad tří mikroregionů Středočeského kraje. Geografický časopis, 64, 4, 357–381.
96. , R. D., HABIBOV, N. (2012): Social capital, human capital, and economic well-being in the knowledge economy: Results from Canada’s General Social Survey. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 39, 2, 31–53.
97. , J. (2018): Demographic, human and social capital as factors of regional development. Ekonomia Społeczna/Social Economy, 1, 68–79.
<https://doi.org/10.15678/ES.2018.1.06>
98. , J., LANG, T. (2018): Peripheralisation: A politics of place, affect, perception and representation. Sociologia Ruralis, 58, 2, 258–275.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12161>
99. , M., DMOCHOWSKA-DUDEK, K., JEZIORSKA-BIEL, P., TOBIASZ-LIS, P. (2018): Understanding strategies for overcoming peripherality: A Polish experience of transition. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 40, 173–192.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2018-0022>
