Geografie 2019, 124, 455-478
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2019124040455
Continental shelf: scientific reality versus legal fiction
References
1. ANDERSON, A. (2009): After the Ice. Life, Death, and Geopolitics in the New Arctic. Harper-Collins Publishers, New York.
2. ANNINOS, P. C. L. (1953): The Continental Shelf and Public International Law, Imprimerie H.P.DE Swart, Hague, In: Dehghani, R. (2009): Continental shelf delimitaton in the Persian Gulf. United Nations – The Nippon Foundation Fellow, http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/dehghani_0809_iran.pdf (5. 7. 2018).
3. ARSANA, M. A., SCHOFIELD, C. (2009): Indonesia’s Submission of the Extended Continental Shelf: Status and Problems, https://www.geospatialworld.net/article/indonesias-submission-of-the-extended-continental-shelf-status-and-problems/ (11. 11. 2018).
4. , K. (2017): The Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf Under Customary International Law, American Journal of International Law, 111, 4, 827–872, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/outer-limits-of-the-continentalshelf-under-customary-international-law/010BB814546A316E3E1EF1885FE0886E (8. 9. 2018).
<https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.84>
5. BROWNLIE, I. (2013): Princípy medzinárodného práva verejného, EUROKÓDEX, Bratislava.
6. CAI, Y. (2006): International law principles of continental shelf delimitation and Sino-Japanese East China Sea disputes, World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden, https://commons.wmu.se/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1161&context=all_dissertations (6. 10. 2018).
7. CLCS (1999): Scientific and Technical Guidelines of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. Adopted by the Commission on 13 May 1999, Commission on the limits of the continental shelf, http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/documents/Guidelines/CLCS_11.htm (26. 8. 2018).
8. COLSON, D. A. (2003): The Delimitation of the Outer Continental Shelf between Neighboring States. The American Journal of International Law, 97, 1, 91–107, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3087106?read-now=1&loggedin=true&seq=7#page_scan_tab_contents (10. 8. 2018).
9. COTTIER, T. (2015): Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: the Quest for Distributive Justice in International Law, Cambridge University Press.
10. DEHGHANI, R. (2009): Continental shelf delimitaton in the Persian Gulf, United Nations – The Nippon Foundation Fellow, http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/dehghani_0809_iran.pdf (5. 7. 2018).
11. Dohovor o kontinentálnom šelfe (1958). United Nations, Treaty Series, https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20499/volume-499-I-7302-English.pdf (5. 7. 2018).
12. DUNDUA, N. (2007): Delimitation of maritime boundaries between adjacent States. United Nations, The Nippon Foundation Fellow, http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/dundua_0607_georgia.pdf (25. 8. 2018).
13. GRAY, D. (1993): Seaward limits of the Continental Shelf and EEZ: Technical Concerns, In: Pharand, D., Leanza, U. (1993): The Continental Shelf and Exclusive Economic Zone, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 19.
14. GRYGAR, R., JELÍNEK, J. (2015): Strukturní a dynamická geomorfologie oceánů. Katedra geologického inženýrství, Hornicko-geologická fakulta, VŠB – Technická univerzita Ostrava, http://geologie.vsb.cz/geomorfologie/Prednasky/7_kapitola.htm (24. 8. 2018).
15. CHRÁŠŤANSKÝ, F., JENNE, D. (2010): Geopolitika Arktidy. Global Politics, http://www.globalpolitics.cz/clanky/geopolitika-arktidy (7. 10. 2018).
16. ICJ (1969): North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic Of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Reublic of Germany v. Netherlands) Judgment of 20 February 1969, https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/51/051-19690220-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (28. 9. 2018).
17. ICJ (1985): Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta) Judgment of 3 June 1985, https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/68/068-19850603-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (28. 9. 2018).
18. ICJ (1993): Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area Between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Denmark v. Norway) Judgment of 14 June 1993, https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/78/078-19930614-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (29. 9. 2018).
19. , M. (2017): The Continental Shelf – five decades of progress (1966–2016), Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, 63, June 2017, 145–156, https://gsm.org.my/products/702001-101704-PDF.pdf (11. 11. 2018).
<https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm63201707>
20. MAGNÚSSON, B. M. (2015): The Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles: Delineation, Delimitation and Dispute Settlement. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden.
21. McDORMAN, T. L. (2013): The International Legal Regime of the Continental Shelf with Special Reference to the Polar Regions. In: Loukacheva, ed. (2013): Polar Law Textbook. Rosendahls-Shultz Grafisk, 77–93.
22. ONDŘEJ, J. (2004): Právní režim mezinárodních prostorů. Aleš Čenek, Plzeň.
23. Oilfield Glossary (2018): Sedimentary Basin, http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/s/sedimentary_basin.aspx (25. 8. 2018).
24. OSN (1964): No. 7302. Convention on the Continental Shelf, https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20499/volume-499-I-7302-English.pdf(2. 9. 2018).
25. OSN (1982): UNCLOS, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. OSN, http://ec.europa.eu/assets/near/neighbourhood-enlargement/ccvista/sk/21998a0623(01)-sk.doc (30. 10. 2018).
26. OSN (1998): The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (A historical perspective). UN, Division for ocean affairs and the law of the sea, office of legal affairs, http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm#TheUnited%20 Nations (2. 9. 2018).
27. OSN (2013): The definition of the continental shelf and criteria for the establishment of its outer limits. UN, Division for ocean affairs and the law of the sea, office of legal affairs, http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/continental_shelf_description.htm#definition (4. 8. 2018).
28. OSN (2017): Law of the Sea, Bulletin 94. UN, Division for ocean affairs and the law of the sea office of legal affairs, http://www.un.org/Depts/los/doalos_publications/LOSBulletins/bulletinpdf/LOS_94_WEB.pdf (3. 11. 2018).
29. OSN (2018a): Codification division, Office of legal affairs. United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, http://legal.un.org/diplomaticconferences/1958_los/ (21. 10. 2018).
30. OSN (2018b): Codification division, office of legal affairs. Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, http://legal.un.org/diplomaticconferences/1973_los/ (21. 10. 2018).
31. OSN (2019): Division for ocean affairs and the law of the sea, Office of legal affairs. Submissions, through the Secretary-General of the United Nations, to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, pursuant to article 76, paragraph 8, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982, http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/commission_submissions.htm (18. 6. 2019).
32. PETRÁNEK, J. (2007): Mořské dno. In: Česká geologická služba (2007): Geologická encyklopedie, http://www.geology.cz/aplikace/encyklopedie/term.pl?morske_dno (24. 8. 2018).
33. POTOČNÝ, M., ONDŘEJ, J. (2011): Mezinárodní právo veřejné – Zvláštní část, C. H. Beck, Praha.
34. ROSSIYA SEVODNYA (2015): Rossiya podala peresmotrennuyu zayavku na rasshireniye shelfa v Arktike, http://ria.ru/economy/20150804/1161384523.html (26. 10. 2018).
35. SMITH, R. W., TAFT, G. (2000): Legal Aspects of the Continental Shelf, In: Cook, P. J., Carleton, C. M. (2000): Continental Shelf Limits: The Scientific and Legal Interface. Oxford University Press, New York, 17–24.
36. SRIVASTAVA, S. P., VARMA, H., MACNAB, R. (2009): The Lomonosov, Alpha and Mendeleev Ridges: Tectonic Scenarios in the ArticOcean and the Test of Appurtenance in UNCLOS Arcticle 76. In: Anderson, A. (ed): After the Ice. Life, Death, and Geopolitics in the New Arctic. Harper-Collins Publishers, New York.
37. SUAREZ, S. V. (2008): The Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf: Legal Aspects of their Establishment. Springer, Heidelberg.
38. SYMONDS, P. A. a kol. (2000): Charasteristics of Continental Margins, In: Cook, P. J., Carleton, C. M. (2000): Continental Shelf Limits: The Scientific and Legal Interface. Oxford University Press, New York, 25–63.
39. TREVES, T. (2016): UNCLOS and Non-Party States before the International Court of Justice. In: Espósito, C., Kraska, J., Schieber, H. N., Kwon, M-S. (2016): Ocean Law and Policy: 20 Years after UNCLOS. Brill/Nijhof, Leiden/Boston, 367–378.
40. TRUMAN, H. S. (1945): Presidential Proclamation 2667: Policy of the United States With Respect to the Natural Resources of the Subsoil and Seabed of the Continental Shelf of 28 September 1945 (Truman Proclamation), http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=12332 (20. 8. 2018).
41. VRŠANSKÝ, P., VALUCH, J. a kol. (2013): Medzinárodné právo verejné. Osobitná časť. EUROKÓDEX, Bratislava.
