Geografie 2019, 124, 187-216
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2019124020187
Research into map-analysis strategies: theory- and data-driven approaches
References
1. ANDERSON, J.R. (1983): Be Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
2. ANDERSON, N.C., ANDERSON, F., KINGSTONE, A., BISCHOF, W.F. (2015): A comparison of scanpath comparison methods. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 4, 1377–1392.
<https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0550-3>
3. CLARK, D., REYNOLDS, S., LEMANOWSKI, V., STILES, T., YASAR, S., PROCTOR, S., LEWIS, E., STROMFORS, C., CORKINS, J. (2008): University Students’ Conceptualization and Interpretation of Topographic Maps. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 3, 377–408.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701191433>
4. ÇÖLTEKIN, A., FABRIKANT, S.I., LACAYO, M. (2010): Exploring the efficiency of users’ visual analytics strategies based on sequence analysis of eye movement recordings. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24, 10, 1559–1575.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.511718>
5. DAMERAU, F.J. (1964): A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM, 7, 3, 171–176.
<https://doi.org/10.1145/363958.363994>
6. DIMOPOULOS, K., ASIMAKOPOULOS, A. (2010): Science on the Web: Secondary School Students’ Navigation Patterns and Preferred Pages’ Characteristics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 3, 246–265.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9197-8>
7. DOLEŽALOVÁ, J., POPELKA, S. (2016a): Evaluation of the User Strategy on 2d and 3d City Maps Based on Novel Scanpath Comparison Method and Graph Visualization. In: Halounová, L., Li, S., Šafář, V., Tomková, M., Rapant, P., Brázdil, K., Shi, W., Anton, F., Liu, Y., Stein, A., Cheng, T., Pettit, C., Li, Q. Q., Sester, M., Mostafavi, M. A., Madden, M., Tong, X., Brovelli, M. A., HaeKyong, K., Kawashima, H., Coltekin, A. (eds.): XXIII ISPRS Congress, Commission II. Copernicus Gesellschau Mbh, Gottingen, 637–640.
<https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B2-637-2016>
8. DOLEŽALOVÁ, J., POPELKA, S. (2016b): ScanGraph: A Novel Scanpath Comparison Method Using Visualisation of Graph Cliques. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9, 4, 1–13.
9. FABRIKANT, S.I., HESPANHA, S.R., HEGARTY, M. (2010): Cognitively Inspired and Perceptually Salient Graphic Displays for Efficient Spatial Inference Making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 1, 13–29.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903362378>
10. FABRIKANT, S.I., REBICH-HESPANHA, S., ANDRIENKO, N., ANDRIENKO, G., MONTELLO, D.R. (2008): Novel Method to Measure Inference Affordance in Static Small-Multiple Map Displays Representing Dynamic Processes. Be Cartographic Journal, 45, 3, 201–215.
<https://doi.org/10.1179/000870408X311396>
11. GAGNÉ, R.M. (1977): Be conditions of learning. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
12. GERACE, W.J. (2001): Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding. In: Franklin, S., Marx, J., Cummings, K. (eds.): Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Research Conference. PERC Publishing, New York, 33–45.
<https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2001.inv.005>
13. GERBER, R., LIDSTONE, J., NASON, R. (1992): Modelling expertise in map reading: Beginnings. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 1, 1, 31–43.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.1992.9964879>
14. GOŁĘBIOWSKA, I. (2015): Legend Layouts for Bematic Maps: A Case Study Integrating Usability Metrics with the Binking Aloud Method. Cartographic Journal, 52, 1, 28–40.
<https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000045>
15. GOŁĘBIOWSKA, I., OPACH, T., RØD, J.K. (2017): For your eyes only? Evaluating a coordinated and multiple views tool with a map, a parallel coordinated plot and a table using an eyetracking approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31, 2, 237–252.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1191636>
16. HAIDER, H., FRENSCH, P.A. (1996): Be Role of Information Reduction in Skill Acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 3, 304–337.
<https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0009>
17. HANUS, M., HAVELKOVÁ, L. (2019): Teachers’ concepts of map skill development. Journal of Geography, 118, 3, 101–116. DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2018.1528294.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1528294>
18. HANUS, M., MARADA, M. (2016): What does a map-skills-test tell us about Czech pupils? Geografie, 121, 2, 279–299.
19. HAVELKOVÁ, L., HANUS, M. (2018): Be Impact of the Map Type on the Level of Student Map Skills. Cartographica, 53, 3, 149–170.
<https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.53.3.2017-0014>
20. HSIEH, T., WU, K. (2015): Be Influence of Gender Difference on the Information-Seeking Behaviors for the Graphical Interface of Children’s Digital Library. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3, 3, 200–206.
<https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030305>
21. HSU, T.C., CHANG, S.C., LIU, N.C. (2018): Peer Assessment of Webpage Design: Behavioral Sequential Analysis Based on Eye-Tracking Evidence. Educational Technology & Society, 21, 2, 305–321.
22. JUST, M.A., CARPENTER, P.A. (1976): Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 4, 441–480.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3>
23. KIM, K., KIM, M., SHIN, J., RYU, J. (2015): Eye-Movement Analysis of Students’ Active Examination Strategy and Its Transfer in Visuospatial Representations. Journal of Geography, 114, 4, 133–145.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.991420>
24. LEVENSHTEIN, V.I. (1966): Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet physics doklady, 10, 8, 707–710.
25. MACEACHREN, A.M. (1995): How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design. Guilford Press, New York.
26. MASON, L., PLUCHINO, P., ARIASI, N. (2014): Reading information about a scientific phenomenon on webpages varying for reliability: an eye-movement analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 6, 663–685.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9356-3>
27. NEEDLEMAN, S.B., WUNSCH, C.D. (1970): A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of to proteins. Journal of molecular biology, 48, 3, 443–453.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4>
28. OOMS, K., DE MAEYER, P., DUPONT, L., VAN DER VEKEN, N., VAN DE WEGHE, N., VERPLAETSE, S. (2015): Education in cartography: what is the status of young people’s map-reading skills? Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43, 2, 134–153.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2015.1021713>
29. OOMS, K., DE MAEYER, P., FACK, V. (2014): Study of the attentive behavior of novice and expert map users using eye tracking. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41, 1, 37–54.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.860255>
30. OOMS, K., DE MAEYER, P., FACK, V., VAN ASSCHE, E., WITLOX, F. (2012): Interpreting maps through the eyes of expert and novice users. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 10, 1773–1788.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.642801>
31. OPACH, T., GOŁĘBIOWSKA, I., FABRIKANT, S.I. (2014): How Do People View Multi-Component Animated Maps? Be Cartographic Journal, 51, 4, 330–342.
<https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000049>
32. PAAS, F., RENKL, A., SWELLER, J. (2003): Cognitive Load Beory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1, 1–4.
<https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1>
33. POLSON, P. G., LEWIS, C., RIEMAN, J., WHARTON, C. (1992): Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 5, 741–773.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N>
34. POPELKA, S. (2014): Optimal eye fixation detection settings for cartographic purposes. In: 14ᵗh SGEM GeoConference on informatics, geoinformatics and remote sensing.
<https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2014/B21/S8.091>
35. POSTIGO, Y., POZO, J.I. (1998): Be Learning of a Geographical Map by Experts and Novices. Educational Psychology, 18, 1, 65–80.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341980180105>
36. RIDING, R.J., BOARDMAN, D.J. (1983): Be Relationship between Sex and Learning Style and Graphicacy in 14‐year‐old Children. Educational Review, 35, 1, 69–79.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191830350108>
37. ROTH, R.E. (2012): Cartographic Interaction Primitives: Framework and Synthesis. Be Cartographic Journal, 49, 4, 376–395.
<https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019>
38. SVENSON, O. (1992): Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes. Acta Psychologica, 80, 1–3, 143–168.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(92)90044-E>
39. VAN DIJK, H., VAN DER SCHEE, J., TRIMP, H., VAN DER ZIJPP, T. (1994): Map skills and geographical knowledge. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 3, 1, 68–80.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.1994.9964928>
40. VOßKÜHLER, A., NORDMEIER, V., KUCHINKE, L., JACOBS, A.M. (2008): OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): Open-source souware designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 4, 1150–1162.
<https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1150>
41. WIEGAND, P. (2006): Learning and Teaching with Maps. Routledge, New York.
<https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203477793>
