Geografie 2018, 123, 529-552
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2018123040529
The Impact of Neoliberalism and Traditions of the European City on the Transformations of the Major Urban Projects Management in Western European and Post-socialist Cities
References
1. , D., TIESDELL, S. (2010): Planners as market actors: Rethinking stat-market relations in land and property, Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 2, 187–207.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/14649351003759631>
2. , A., BERRY, J., MCGREAL, S., SÝKORA, L., GHANBARI PARSA, A., REDDING, B. (1999): Globalization of real estate markets in Central Europe. European Planning Studies, 7, 295–305.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720519>
3. , A., NORMAN, HUTCHISON, N., MCGREAL, S. (2007), Attracting Institutional Investment into Regeneration: Necessary Conditions for Effective Funding, Journal of Property Research 24, 221–240.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09599910701599282>
4. , A., BERRY, J., MCGREAL, S. (2003): Financing Property’s Contribution to Regeneration. Urban Studies, 40, 5–6, 1065–1080.
5. BAGNASCO, A., LE GALLÈS, P. (1997): Villes en Europe, La Découverte, Paris.
6. , I., TRAUTMANN, F. (2016): Vers de vrais partenariats aménageurpromoteurs?, La revue foncière, 1–2, 9–14.
7. BERTRAUD, A. (2002): Note on Prague’s city Structure, 2002, Word Bank Report, World Bank, Washington DC.
8. BERTRAUD, A. (2006): The spatial structures of Central and Eastern European cities. In: Tsenkova, S., Nedović-Budić, Z. (eds): The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 91–110.
9. BRENNER, N. (2004): New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood, Oxford Univerity Press, Oxford New, York.
10. CABERNET TEAM (2006): Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: Cabernet Network Report, University of Notthingham.
11. DJORDJEVIC, M. (2006): Politics of Urban Development Planning: Building Urban Governance in Post-Socialist Warsaw? Report, First Annual Doctoral Conference of the Department of Political Science of Central European University, Budapest.
12. DOLEŽELOVÁ, L. (2014): Régénération Des friches industrielles: Politiques publiques et projets de réaménagement en France et en République tchèque, Éditions universitaires européennes, Saarbrücken.
13. DOLEŽELOVÁ, L. (2016): Regenerace brownfieldů. Vývoj politik a příklady realizací. IREAS o. p. s., Praha.
14. , L., MACOUN, M. (2017): Kam kráčí francouzský urbanismus? Plánování a realizace velkých projektů s účastí privátních developerů. Architektúra a urbanismus, 51, N1-2, 2–15.
15. , L., VEJCHODSKÁ, E. (2018): Mnichovský model – Nastavení finanční participace investorů na základě zastavitelnosti území, Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, XX, 3, 11–15.
16. DOLEŽELOVÁ, L., MACOUN, M. (v redakci): Causes and Effects of Blocking Redevelopment within Centrally Located Brownfields in Prague, Czech Republic, submitted to International Journal of the Constructed Environment, 2017.
17. , M., MATUSCHEWSKI, A. (2007): Grossprojekte in der Stadtentwicklung – Konfliktbereiche und Erfolgsfaktoren. DisP, The Planning Review, 43, 171, https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2007.10556992 (12.05.2018).
18. EVROPSKÁ KOMISE (2000): Kompendium Evropské unie o systémech, politikách a zásadách územního plánování a rozvoje, Luxembourg Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, český překlad Ústav územního rozvoje, Brno.
19. FAINSTEIN, S. (2001): The City Builders: Property Development in New York and London, 1980–2000, Revised edition, Lawrence, University Press of Kansas.
20. , S. (2008): Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32, 768–785.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00826.x>
21. , S. (2016): Financialisation and justice in the city: A commentary, Urban Studies, 53, 7, 1503–1508.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016630488>
22. GUIRONNET, A. HALBERT, L. (2014): The financialization of Urban Development Projects: Concepts, processes, and implications. Latts Working Paper 14. https://hal-enpc.archivesouvertes.fr/hal-01097192 (12.06.2016).
23. S., MIOSGA, M. (2007): Grossprojekte in München im Spannungsfeld Zwischen Wettbewerbsorientierter Stadtentwicklungsstrategie, Sozialer Integration und ökologischen Belangen. The Planning Review, 43, 171, 25–35.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2007.10556994>
24. , D. (1989): From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism, Geografiska Annaler, 71B-1, 3–17.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583>
25. HÄUSERMANN, H., HAILA, A. (2005): The European City: A Conceptual Framework and a Normative Project. In Kazepov ed. Cities of Europe, Blackwell, Oxford.
26. , P., BARRETT, S. (1990): Structure and Agency in Land and Property Development Processes: Some Ideas for Research. Urban Studies, 27, 1, 89–104.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989020080051>
27. , E., HOBMA, F. (2014): Private Sector-led Urban Development Projects: Comparative Insights from Planning Practices in the Netherlands and the UK, Planning, Practice and Research, 29, 4, 350–369.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.932196>
28. HORÁK, M. (2014): Úspěch i zklamání: Demokracie a veřejná politika v Praze 1990–2000. Karolinum, Praha.
29. , J. (1996): Planning through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal. Journal of American Planning Association, 62, 460–472.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975712>
30. IPR (2014): Územně analytické podklady, část 400 Rozvojový potenciál, Institut plánování a rozvoje města Prahy, Praha, 4–23.
31. , R., PARSA, A., MCGREAL, S. (2002): Institutions and Urban Change in a Globalising World: The Case of Warsaw. Cities, 19, 183–193.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00015-X>
32. , K., SCOTT, J. W. (2012): Urban Regeneration in the Post-Socialist Context: Budapest and the Search for a Social Dimension, European Planning Studies, 20, 7, 1111–1134.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.674346>
33. KOCH, F. (2010): Die europäische Stadt in Transformation: Stadtplanung und Stadtentwicklungspolitik im postsozialistischen Warschau, VS Verlag für SozialwissenschaEen.
34. KOVÁCS, Z. (2006): Social and economic transformation of historical districts in Budapest, Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres. The Case of Central Europe, Pécs, Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 39–64.
35. , P. (2007): Strategies, Stakeholders and large-scale projects: o few pointers, Cahiers del’Iaurif, 146, 7–11.
36. LE GALLÈS, P. (2011): Le retour des villes européennes: Societés urbaines, mondialisation et gouvernace, Les Presses de Sciences Po, Paris.
37. , P. (2016): Neoliberalism and uban change: Stretching a good idea too far? Territory, Politics, Governance, 4, 2, 154–172.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1165143>
38. , K. (1998): Czech planning in transition: assets and deficiencies. International Planning Studies, 3, 3, 351–365.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13563479808721719>
39. , K. (1998): Czech planning in transition: assets and deficiencies. International Planning Studies, 3, 3, 351–365.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13563479808721719>
40. , K. (2010): Poevropšťování českého plánování? Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, XIII, 5, 109–115.
41. MOULAERT, F., RODRIGUEZ, A., SWYNGEDOUW, E. (2003): The Globalized City – Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. NAPPY-CHOULET, I. (2009): Les mutations de l’immobillier, De la finance au développementt durable, Autrement, Paris.
43. , I. (2013): La financiarisation du marché immobilier français: de la crise des années 1990 à la crise des subprimes de 2008. Revue d’Economie Financière, 110, 189–205.
<https://doi.org/10.3917/ecofi.110.0189>
44. PECK, J., THEODORE, N., BRENNER, N. (2009): Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29, 1, Johns Hopkins University Press, 49–66.
45. PINSON, G. (2005): L’idéologie des projets urbains: L’analyse des politiques urbaines entre précédant anglo-saxon et détour italien, Sciences de la Société, Presses universitaires du Midi, 28–51.
46. PIXOVÁ, M. (2018): The Empowering Potential of Reformist Urban Activism in Czech Cities. Voluntas. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.
47. SALET W., E. GUALINI, E., eds. (2007): Framing Strategic Urban Projects: Learning from Current Experiences in European Urban Regions, Taylor & Francis, Routledge, Londres.
48. , F., SALET, W., MAJOOR, S. (2015): Dilemmas of planning: Intervention, regulation and investment, Planning Theory, 14, 3, 296–315.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214531430>
49. STANILOV, K. (2010): Urban development policies in Central and Eastern Europe during the transition period and their impact on urban form. In Stanilov ed. The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Tansformations in Central and Eastern Europe aEer Socialism, Spriger, Heidelberg, 347–359.
50. STANILOV, K., SÝKORA, L., eds. (2014): Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe, Studies in Urban and Social Change Wiley- Blackwell, Oxford.
51. , L., BOUZAROVSKI, S. (2012): Multiple transformations: conceptualizing postcommunist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49, 49–58.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402>
52. SZELENYI, I. (1996): Cities under Socialism – And After. In: Ndrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelényi, I. (eds) Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-socialist Societies. Oxford, Blackwell, 286–317.
53. TAŞAN-KOK, T. (2006): Institutional and spatial change. In: Tsenkova, S., Nedovic-Budic, Z.: The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy, Physica, Heidelberg, New York, 51–70.
54. TEMELOVÁ, J., NOVÁK, J. (2007): From industrial neighbourhood to modern urban centre. Transformation in physical and functional environment of central Smíchov. Proceedings of the Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2007 conference, Prague.
55. THIERSTEIN, A., REISS-SCHMIDT, S. (2008): Urban Development Management in Munich, Germany, Integrated strategy, impacts, learning from external evaluation, 44ᵗh ISOCARP Congress 2008, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242415510_Urban_Development_Management_in_Munich_Germany_Integrated_strategy_impacts_learning_from_external_evaluation (12.05.2017).
56. TIESDELL, S., DAVID, A. (2011): Urban Design in the Real Estate Development Process, Wiley- Blackwell, Chichester.
57. TSENKOVA, S., NEDOVIC-BUDIC, Z. (2006): The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy, Physica 2006, Heidelberg, New York, 3–55.
58. TOSICS, I. (2006): Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest. In: Tsenkova, S, Nedovic- Budic, Z.: The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy, Physica, Heidelberg, New York, 131–150.
59. VERHAGE, R., LINOSSIER, R. (2009): La co-production public-privé des projets urbains: entre création de valeur économique et réalisation des objectifs publics. In: Boino, P. (ed.): Lyon: La production de la Ville, Parenthèse, Paris.
60. VILMIN, T. (2015): L’aménagement urbain, acteurs et systeme, Parentheses, Paris.
