Geografie 2017, 122, 500-525
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2017122040500
“I do not mind immigrants; it is immigration that bothers me.” The inconsistency of immigration attitudes in Europe
References
1. , P. (2014): Srovnatelnost Schwartzovy hodnotové škály v mezinárodních datech. Czech Sociological Review, 50, 4, 547–581.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2014.50.4.108>
2. , L., HUTCHINGS, V.L. (1996): Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer›s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 6, 951–972.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2096302>
3. BREWER, M.B., MILLER, N. (1984): Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In: Miller, N., Brewer, M.B. (eds.): Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation, Academic Press, Orlando, 281–302.
4. , E. (2008): A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2, 1, 33–46.
5. , J.C. (2006): The Ties That Bind and Those That Don›t: Toward Reconciling Group Threat and Contact Theories of Prejudice. Social Forces, 84, 4, 2179–2204.
<https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0085>
6. , D. (2011): Imigrace a integrace cizinců v Česku: Několik zastavení na cestě země v její migrační proměně z Davida na téměř Goliáše. Geografie, 116, 4, 401–421.
7. , J., GREEN, D. P., MUSTE, C., WONG, C. (1997): Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform the Role of Economic Motivations. The Journal of Politics, 59, 3, 858–881.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2998640>
8. , M., SCHEEPERS, P. (2003): The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: an international comparison. Political Psychology, 24, 2, 313–343.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00330>
9. FACCHINI, C., MAYDA, A.M. (2006): Individual Attitudes towards Immigrants: Welfare-State Determinants across Countries. IZA Discussion Paper 2127. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
10. FORBES, H.D. (2004): Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis. Yale University Press.
11. , J., HISCOX, M.J. (2007): Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International organization, 61, 2, 399–442.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070142>
12. HECKMANN, F., SCHNAPPER, D. (2003): The Integration of Immigrants in European Societies: national differences and trends of convergence. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.
13. INGLEHART, R., WELZEL, C. (2005): Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
14. , M.R., HEWSTONE, M. (1993): Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19, 6, 700–710.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196005>
15. LEONTIYEVA, Y. (2015): Postoje k migrantům v zemích Visegradské čtyřky: proměny v čase a kontexuální vlivy. In: Vlachová, K. (ed.): Národní identity a identifikace, SLON, Praha, 143–156.
16. MAYDA, A.M. (2004): Who is Against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants. IZA Discussion Paper 1115, IZA, Bonn.
17. , B.E. DAVIDOV, J., BILLIET (2009): Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research, 38, 2, 352–365.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.006>
18. OKÓLSKI, M. (2012): Transition from emigration to immigration: Is it a destiny of modern European countries. In: Europe, The continent of immigrants. Trends, structures and policy implications, IMISCOE Research Series, Amsterdam University Press, 10–27.
19. , H., BURGE, P., BROWN, H.K., ARSENAULT, E. (2010): Public attitudes towards individuals with intellectual disabilities as measured by the concept of social distance. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 2, 132–142.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00514.x>
20. , T.F. (1979): The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 5, 4, 461–476.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727900500407>
21. , T.F. (1998): Intergroup contact theory. Annual review of psychology, 49, 1, 65–85.
<https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65>
22. , T.F., TROPP, L.R. (2006): A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90, 5, 751–783.
<https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751>
23. , T.F., TROPP, L.R., WAGNER, U., CHRIST, O. (2011): Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 3, 271–280.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001>
24. , S.L. (2008): Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review 24, 1, 53–67.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm034>
25. , L. (1995): Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 4, 586–611.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2096296>
26. , L. (1996): Group threat and regional change in attitudes toward African-Americans. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 3, 816–860.
<https://doi.org/10.1086/230998>
27. , R., SEMYONOV, M. (2004): Perceived threat and exclusionary attitudes towards foreign workers in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 5, 780–799.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000246345>
28. , M., SCHEEPERS, P., TOLSMA, J., HAGENDOORN, L. (2010): Anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of contradictory hypotheses derived from ethnic competition theory and intergroup contact theory. European Sociological Review, 27, 6, 741–758.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq035>
29. , M., RAIJMAN, R., TOV, A.Y., SCHMIDT, P. (2004): Population size, perceived threat, and exclusion: A multiple-indicators analysis of attitudes toward foreigners in Germany. Social Science Research, 33, 4, 681–701.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.11.003>
30. , P., GIJSBERTS, M., COENDERS, M. (2002): Ethnic exclusionism in European countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European sociological review, 18, 1, 17–34.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/18.1.17>
31. , E., SCHEEPERS, P. (2010): The relationship between outgroup size and antioutgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat-and intergroup contact theory. Social Science Research, 39, 2, 285–295.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.07.006>
32. , E., WAGNER, U. (2008): Regional differences matter examining the dual influence of the regional size of the immigrant population on derogation of immigrants in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49, 2–3, 153–173.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0020815207088910>
33. , Z., AALBERG, T., VALENTA, M. (2014): Attitudes towards Muslim immigrants: evidence from survey experiments across four countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 1, 100–118.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.831542>
34. , Z., LISTHAUG, O. (2008): Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries. Social Science Research, 37, 1, 268–286.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.02.004>
35. , S.H. (1992): Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, 1–65.
36. VLACHOVÁ , K. (2017): Significant others and the importance of ancestry for Czech national identity. National Identities, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14608944.2017.1362378 (1.9.2017).
37. , U., CHRIST, O., PETTIGREW, T.F., STELLMACHER, J., WOLF, C. (2006): Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social psychology quarterly, 69, 4, 380–390.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900406>
38. , B., COLLINS, F.L. (2016): Emotions and cosmopolitan sociability: Barriers and opportunities for intercultural encounters amongst new Chinese migrants in New Zealand. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 42, 1, 88–102.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1073579>
39. , C., GALLIHER, J.F. (2007): Emory Bogardus and the origins of the social distance scale. The American Sociologist, 38, 4, 383–395.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-007-9023-9>
40. , R., GUPPY, N., FARRIS, L. (2008): No Thanks, We’re Full: Individual Characteristics, National Context, and Changing Attitudes Toward Immigration. International Migration Review, 42, 2, 302–329.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00126.x>
41. ZICH, F., ANÝŽOVÁ, P., eds. (2016): Konfrontace hodnot v pozdní modernitě: Česko a Hlučínsko v evropském kontextu, SLON. Praha.
