Geografie 2017, 122, 449-475

https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2017122040449

Legitimising settlement of refugees: unpacking humanitarianism from a comparative perspective

Ahmet Içduygu1, Aysen Ustubici2,3, Izem Aral3, Balacan Ayar3

1Koç University, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Turkey
2Koç University, Department of International Relations; Turkey
3Koç University, Department of Sociology; Turkey

Received February 2017
Accepted September 2017

References

1. ALEINIKOFF, T.A. (1992): State-centered refugee law: From resettlement to containment. Mich. J. Int’l L. 14, 120–138.
2. BARNETT, N.M. (2014): Refugees and humanitarianism. In: Quasmiyeh, E.F., Loescher, G., Long, K., Sigona, N. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, 241–253.
3. BENHABIB, S. (2004): The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. BIALASIEWICZ, L. (2012): Off-shoring and out-sourcing the borders of Europe: Libya and EU border work in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics, 17, 4, 843–866. <https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.660579>
5. BROWN, C. (2010): The Only Thinkable Figure? Ethical and Normative Approaches to Refugees in International Relations. In: Betts, A, Loescher, G. (eds.): The Refugees in International Relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 151–168.
6. CARPI, E. (2016): Against Ontologies of Hospitality: About Syrian Refugeehood in Northern Lebonan. Published on 27th October, 2016, http://www.mei.edu/content/map/againstontologies-hospitality-about-syrian-refugeehood-northern-lebanon (30.11.2016).
7. CHIMNI, B.S. (2000): Globalization, humanitarianism and the erosion of refugee protection. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13, 3, 243–263. <https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/13.3.243>
8. EVERY, D. (2008): A Reasonable, Practical and Moderate Humanitarianism: The Co-Option of Humanitarianism in the Australian Asylum Seeker Debates. Journal of Refugee Studies. 21, 2, 210–229. <https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen013>
9. GIBNEY, M.J. (2004): The ethics and politics of asylum: liberal democracy and the response to refugees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. GIBNEY, M., HANSEN, R. (2003): Asylum policy in the West: Past trends, future possibilities. World Institute for Development Economics Research Discussion Paper, 68.
11. GOODWIN-GILL (2016): The Movements of People between States in the 21st Century: An Agenda for Urgent Institutional Change. International Journal of Refugee Law, 28, 4, 679–694. <https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eew040>
12. HOLMES, S.M., CASTANEDA, H. (2016): Representing the “European Refugee Crisis” in Germany and beyond. American Ethnologist, 43, 1, 12–24. <https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12259>
13. HUYSMANS, J. (2006): The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. Abingdon, Routledge.
14. İÇDUYGU, A. (2016): Turkey: Labour market integration and social inclusion of refugees, European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies. Published on December, 2016, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/595328/IPOL_STU(2016)595328_EN.pdf IP/A/EMPL/2016-13, Brussels (18.8.2017).
15. İÇDUYGU, A. (2015): Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The long road ahead. Washington DC: MPI.
16. İÇDUYGU, A., MILLET, E. (2016): Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Insecure Lives in an Environment of Pseudo-integration. Istituto Affari Internazionali: Global Turkey in Europe. Issue Working Papers 13, http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_wp_13.pdf (18.8.2017).
17. İÇDUYGU, A., TOKTAŞ, Ş. (2016): After the EU-Turkey refugee deal: A Perspective from Turkey, Briefing for the Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendeal”. https://www.clingendael.nl/publication/after-eu-turkey-refugee-deal-perspective-turkey (18.8.2017).
18. İÇDUYGU, A., ŞİMŞEK, D. (2017): Bargaining over Refugees: Turkey’s View. In: Pastore, F. (ed.): Beyond the Migration and Refugee Crisis, Aspen Institute Italia, Roma, 83–91.
19. KIRKWOOD, S. (2017): The Humanisation of Refugees: A Discourse Analysis of UK Parliamentary Debates on the European Refugee ‘Crisis’. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 27, 2, 115–125. <https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2298>
20. KLOOS, S. (2016): The Neo-Ottoman turn in Turkey’s Refugee Discourse. Alternatif Politika. 8, 3, 536–561.
21. MILNER, J. (2014): Protracted Refugee Situations. In: Quasmiyeh, E.F., Loescher, G., Long, K., Sigona, N. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, Oxford, UK, 176–187.
22. OSTRAND, N. (2015): The Syrian Refugee Crisis: A comparison of Responses by Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal on Migration and Human Security. 3, 3, 255–279. <https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241500300301>
23. OWEN, D. (2016): In Loco Civitatis: On the Normative Structure of the International Refugee Regime. In: Fine, S., Ypi, L. (eds.): Migration in Political Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 269–290.
24. UNHCR EXCOM (2009): Conclusion on Protracted Refugee Situations, No. 109.
25. YÜCEBAŞ, M. (2015): Gaziantep Yerel Basınında Suriyeli İmgesi: Yeni Taşranın Yeni Suskunları: Suriyeliler. Birikim, 311, 38–47.
front cover

ISSN 1212-0014 (Print) ISSN 2571-421X (Online)

Archive