Geografie 2017, 122, 169-189
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2017122020169
Geography of Czech aid: Where and why Czechia promotes development?
References
1. , A., DOLLAR, D. (2000): Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 1, 33–63.
<https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009874203400>
2. BARTHEL, F., NEUMAYER, E., NUNNENKAMP, P., SELAYA, P. (2013): Competition for Export Markets and the Allocation of Foreign Aid: The Role of Spatial Dependence among Donor Countries. Kiel Working Paper No. 1875. Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
3. , P. (1987): Foreign Aid and Domestic Savings in Less Developed Countries: Some Tests for Causality. World Development, 15, 6, 789–796.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(87)90060-X>
4. , J.C. (2006): Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics, 10, 2, 179–1940.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00311.x>
5. , J.C., TICHIT, A. (2004): Bilateral Donors’ Aid Allocation Decisions – A Threedimensional Panel Analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 13, 3, 253–274.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2003.11.004>
6. , C., DOLLAR, D. (2000): Aid, policies and growth. American Economic Review, 90, 4, 847–868.
<https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.847>
7. CANAVIRE, G., NUNNENKAMP, P., THIELE, R., TRIVEÑO, L. (2005): Assessing the Allocation of Aid: Developmental Concerns and the Self-Interest of Donors. Working Paper No. 1253. Kiel: Kiel Institute for World Economics.
8. , P., DOLLAR, D. (2004): Development Effectiveness: What Have We Learnt? The Economic Journal, 114, 496, 244–271.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00221.x>
9. DREHER, A., NUNNENKAMP, P., ÖHLER, H., WEISSER, J. (2009): Acting Autonomously or Mimicking the State and Peers? A Panel Tobit Analysis of Financial Dependence and Aid Allocation by Swiss NGOs. Working Paper No. 1486. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
10. EXNEROVÁ, V. (2005): Zahraniční rozvojová spolupráce České republiky. In: Exnerová, V. (ed.): Globální problémy a rozvojová spolupráce. Témata, o které se lidi zajímají. Člověk v tísni, společnost při ČT, o. p. s., Praha, 115–120.
11. FREEDOM HOUSE (2015): Freedom in the World Country Ratings, 1972–2014, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Individual%20Country%20Ratings%20and%20Status%2C%201973-2015%20%28FINAL%29.xls (25. 10. 2016).
12. GRIMM, S., HARMER, A. (2005): Diversity in Donorship: the Changing Landscape of Official Humanitarian Aid. Aid Donorship in Central Europe. Overseas Development Institute, London.
13. , J., SYROVÁTKA, M., OPRŠAL, Z. (2017) Analýza faktorů selekce a alokace české rozvojové pomoci s využitím panelových dat a metod Probit a Tobit. Politická ekonomie, 65, 2, 179–197.
<https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1135>
14. , J., WANG, C. (2011): A New Approach to the Allocation of Aid Among Developing Countries: Is the USA different from the Rest? World Development, 39, 8, 1281–1293.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.011>
15. , O. (2011): Depoliticization, instrumentalization and legitimacy of Czech development cooperation: A case of imposed altruism? Éthique et économique/Ethics and Economie, 8, 1, 120–132.
16. , O., LIGHTFOOT, S. (2012): From Aid Recipients to Aid Donors? Development Policies of Central and Eastern European States. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 3, 1, 1–16.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.649169>
17. , P., SYROVÁTKA, M., OPRŠAL, Z. (2012): Assessing the aid effectiveness of the Czech Republic: commitment to development index and beyond. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13, 1, 100–116.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2011.649170>
18. LEICHTOVÁ, M., PIKNEROVÁ, L. (2013): Rozvojová spolupráce východního bloku v době studené války. 1. vyd. Dokořán, Praha.
19. , E., BREUNIG, C., PRAKASH, A. (2010): Instrumental Philanthropy: Trade and the Allocation of Foreign Aid. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43, 3, 733–761.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423910000661>
20. , A., NISSANKE, M.K. (1984): Motivations for Aid to Developing countries. World Development, 12, 9, 879–900.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(84)90046-9>
21. , T., ZIGNAGO, S. (2011): Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: the GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Paper, 2011, 25.
22. McGILLIVRAY, M. (2003): Modelling Aid Allocation: Issues, Approaches and Results. Discussion Paper No. 2003/49. World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki.
23. , R.D., LITTLE, R. (1979): The U.S Aid Relationship: The Test of Recipient Need and Donor Interest Models. Political Studies, 27, 2, 236–250.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1979.tb01201.x>
24. MIHÁLIK, J., VESELÁ, V., JAKSA, B., WOJTALIK, M. (2010): Least but not Last? Least Developed Countries in Official Development Assistance of Visegrad Four Countries. People in Need, Prague.
25. MFA (2002): Overseas Development Assistance Strategy of the Czech Republic for the period 2002–2007 (Government Resolution No 91/2002 of 23 January 2002).
26. MFA (2004): Principles of Development Cooperation after the Czech Republic’s Accession to the EU.
27. MFA (2012): Development Cooperation Strategy of the Czech Republic 2010–2017, http://www.mzv.cz/file/762314/FINAL_Development_Cooperation_Strategy_2010_2017.pdf (13.7.2016).
28. MFA (2013): Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid. http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/en/foreign_relations/development_cooperation_and_humanitarian/ (13.7.2016).
29. MFA (2015): Výroční zprávy a dokumenty. Ministerstvo zahraničních věcí ČR. http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/zahranicni_vztahy/vyrocni_zpravy_a_dokumenty/ (8.5.2016).
30. , T., KRYLOVÁ, P., HORKÝ-HLUCHÁŇ, O., HEJKRLÍK, J., JÍLKOVÁ, K. (2014): The Czech government scholarship programme for students from developing countries – Evaluation findings and policy reflections. Evaluation and Program Planning, 43, 83–89.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.002>
31. NEUMAYER, E. (2003): The Pattern of Aid Giving: The Impact of Good Governance on Development Assistance. Routledge, London.
32. OECD (2007): DAC Special Review of the Czech Republic. http://www.oecd.org/dac/peerreviews/45367897.pdf (15.4.2016).
33. OECD (2015a): Development Co-operation Report 2015: Making Partnerships Effective Coalitions for Action, OECD Publishing, Paris.
34. OECD (2015b): OECD.Stat. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx (5.10.2015).
35. OECD (2016): Czech Republic – the Development Assistance Committee’s 26th Member, http://www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/peer-review-czechrepublic.htm (15.6.2016).
36. , Z., HARMÁČEK, J., SYROVÁTKA, M. (2016): The Allocation of Czech Foreign Aid in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Influence of Historical Relationships. Int. J. Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 9, 4, 325–343.
<https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2016.081401>
37. , S.C., SIRIRANGSI, R. (1993): Human Rights and U.S. Economic Aid to Africa. International Interactions, 18, 4, 309–322.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629308434811>
38. POLITY IV (2015): Polity IV Individual Country Regime Trends, 1946–2013, http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (8. 10. 2016).
39. , P.J., HOOK, S.W., TAYLOR, B. (1998): Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows. World Politics, 50, 2, 294–323.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008121>
40. SLÁDKOVÁ, Z. (2011): Czech Republic and its Official Development Assistance, Briefing Paper 2/2011, FoRS, Praha.
41. STAAR, R.F. (1982): Communist Regimes in Eastern Europe, 4th ed. Hoover Press Publication, Stanford, CA.
42. , R., STRIELKOWSKI, W., DRBOHLAV, D. (2011): Pracovní migrace a remitence: Současné trendy v době ekonomické krize. Geografie, 116, 4, 375–400.
43. , M., KRYLOVÁ, P. (2012): Aid dimension of the Commitment to Development Index: Case study of the Czech Republic. International Journal of Sustainable Economy 4, 4, 323–339.
<https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2012.049611>
44. , B. (2012): Aid allocation of the emerging Central and Eastern European donors. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15, 1, 65–89.
<https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2011.19>
45. , J.P., STRAND, J.R., EMMERT, C.F. (2009): The Disbursement Pattern of Japanese Foreign Aid: A Reappraisal. Journal of East Asian Studies, 9, 219–248.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S159824080000299X>
46. UNCTAD (2015): The Least Developed Countries Report 2015. Transforming Rural Economies. United Nations, Geneva.
47. UNDP (2015): Human Development Reports: Data. United Nations Development Programme, http://hdr.undp.org/en/data (17.10.2016).
48. UNITED NATIONS (2016): UN Comtrade Database, http://comtrade.un.org/data/. (6.10.2016).
49. WALZ, J., RAMACHANDRAN, V. (2011): Brave New World. A Literature Review of Emerging Donors and the Changing Nature of Foreign Assistance, Centre for Global Development Working Paper No. 273, http://www.cgdev.org/publication/brave-new-worldliterature-reviewemerging-donors-and-changing-nature-foreign-assistance.
50. WORLD BANK (2015a): World Development Indicators, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (17.10.2016).
51. WORLD BANK (2015b): Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home (17.10.2016).
52. , J. (2008): Motivation for Bilateral Aid Allocation: Altruism or Trade Benefits. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 661–674.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.05.003>
53. Zákon č. 151/2010 Sb. ze dne 21. dubna 2010, o zahraniční rozvojové spolupráci a humanitární pomoci poskytované do zahraničí, http://www.czda.cz/editor/filestore/File/Zakon%20o%20ZRS%20151_2010.pdf (23. 7. 2016).
54. ZÍDEK, P., SIEBER, K. (2007): Československo a subsaharská Afrika v letech 1948–1989. Ústav mezinárodních vztahů, Praha.
55. , F., SMITH, K. (2011): More Actors, More Money, More ideas for International Development Co-operation. Journal of International Development, 23, 5, 722–738.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1796>
56. ZWASS, A. (1989): The Council for Mutual Economic Assistance: The Thorny Path from Political to Economic Integration. M. E. Sharpe, New York, NY; London.
