Geografie 2016, 121, 54-78
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2016121010054
Improvement in physical river habitat quality in response to river restoration measures
References
1. , S.K. (2007): You Can’t Not Choose: Embracing the Role of Choice in Ecological Restoration. Restoration Ecology, 15, 601–605.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00271.x>
2. , P.J., HOLMES, N.T.H., RAVEN, P.J. (2010): Developing standard approaches for recording and assessing river hydromorphology: the role of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Marine and freshwater ecosystems, 20, 55–61.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1097>
3. CHMI (2008): Daily precipitation data from hydro stations Hamry, Krucemburk a Vysočina in period 1998–2007.
4. Committee for Standardization (2004): EN 14614 Water quality – Guidance standard for assessing the hydromorphological features of rivers. Brussels.
5. ČSN 75 7221 (1998): Jakost vod – Klasifikace jakosti povrchových vod.
6. , M.A., SLOBODKIN, L.B. (2004): The Science and Values of Restoration Ecology. Restoration Ecology, 12, 1–3.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.0351.x>
7. , S., PIEGAY, H. (2009): From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications, 25, 568–581.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1239>
8. , C.K., BIRK, S., BRADLEY, D.C., HERING, D., KAIL, J., MARZIN, A., MELCHER, A., NEMITZ, D., PEDERSEN, M.L., PLETTERBAUER, F., PONT, D., VERDONSCHOT, P.F.M., FRIBERG, N. (2011): From Natural to Degraded Rivers and Back Again: A Test of Restoration Ecology Theory and Practice. Advances in Ecological Research, 44, 119–209.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374794-5.00003-1>
9. GANN, G.D., LAMB, D. (2006): Ecological restoration: A mean of conserving biodiversity and sustaining livelihoods (version 1.1). Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona, USA and IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
10. , D.M., SADLER, J.P., WOOD, P.J. (2007): Hydroecology and ecohydrology: a potential route forward? Hydrological Processes, 21, 3385–3390.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6888>
11. HMÚ (1970): Hydrologické poměry ČSSR. III. díl. Hydrometeorological institute, Turnov.
12. , S.C., BRABEC, K., BUFFAGNI, A., ERBA, S., LORENZ, A.W., OFENBÖCK, T., VERDONSCHOT, P.F.M., HERING, D. (2010): A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 671–680.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01807.x>
13. , K., TREPEL, M., MERRITT, D., ROSENTHA, G. (2006): Restoration ecology of river valleys. Basic and Applied Ecology, 7, 383–387.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2006.05.008>
14. JUST, T. et al. (2005): Vodohospodářské revitalizace a jejich uplatnění v ochraně před povodněmi. Český svaz ochránců přírody, Prague.
15. , T., HILL, A.R. (2008): Modeling the effect of lowland stream restoration projects on stream-subsurface water exchange. Ecological engineering, 32, 310–319.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.12.006>
16. , Z., MATOUŠKOVÁ, M., ŠOBR, M., POTŮČKOVÁ, M., HUJSLOVÁ, J. (2008): Fluvial dynamics and selected methods of ecohydrological monitoring of restored Sviňovický brook channel. AUC–Geographica, 1–2, 125–144.
17. LANGHAMMER, J. (2007): HEM. Hydroekologický monitoring. Metodika a manuál pro mapovatele. Charles University in Prague, Prague.
18. LANGHAMMER, J. (2008): HEM. Hydroekologický monitoring. Charles University in Prague, Prague.
19. LANGHAMMER, J., VAJSKEBR, V. (2007): Využití GIS pro analýzu a zkrácení říční sítě na základě historických mapových podkladů. In: Langhammer, J. (ed.): Povodně a změny v krajině. Charles University in Prague, Prague, 153–168.
20. , R.S.E.W., NIENHUIS, P.H. (2001). River restoration and flood protection: controversy or sinergism? Hydrobiologia, 444, 85–99.
21. , V., JÜPNER, R., MÜLLER, S., FELD, C.K. (2004): Renaturalization of streams and rivers – the special importance of integrated ecological methods in measurement of success. An example from Saxony-Anhalt (Germany). Limnologica, 34, 249–263.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0075-9511(04)80049-5>
22. , M. (2005): Assessment of the human impact on the river network as a basis for the ecohydrological monitoring of streams. Geographical Review, 129, 35–46.
23. , M. (2008a): Assessment of the river habitat quality within European Water Framework Directive: Application to different catchments in Czechia. Geografie, 113, 223–236.
24. MATOUŠKOVÁ, M. (2008b): Ekohydrologický monitoring vodních toků v kontextu Evropské Rámcové směrnice o vodní politice EC2000/60. Charles University in Prague, Prague.
25. , M., WEISS, A., MATSCHULLAT, J. (2010): Ecological survey of river habitat diversity: trans-boundary cooperation in the Ore Mountains (Krušné hory, Erzgebirge). Geografie, 115, 3, 284–307.
26. , J., REEZE, B., FELD, C.K., HENDRINKS, A.J. (2010): Lessons from practice: assessing early progress and Access in river rehabilitation. Hydrobiologia, 655, 1–14.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0389-2>
27. , M., HESSION, W.C., RIZZO, D.M. (2010): Riparian reforestation and channel change: How long does it take? Geomorphology, 116, 330–340.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.014>
28. , J.M., THEILING, C.H., LUBINSKI, K.S., SMITH, D.L. (2010): Reference condition approach to restoration planning. River Research and Applications, 26, 1199–1219.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1330>
29. , M.D., LARGE, A.R.G. (2006): “Natural” rivers, “hydromorphological quality” and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31, 1606–1624.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1430>
30. , H.G., LARGE, A.R.G., NEWSON, M.D., WALSH, C.L. (2008): A predictive typology for characteristing hydromorphology. Geomorphology, 100, 32–40.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.10.022>
31. , M.A. et al. (2005): Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 208–217.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x>
32. , M., THOMS, M.C. (2007): Hierarchical patterns of physical–biological associations in river ecosystems. Geomorphology, 89, 127–146.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.016>
33. , P.J., HOLMES, N.T.H., VAUGHAN, I.P., DAWSON, F.H., SCARLETT, P. (2010): Benchmarking habitat quality: observations using River Habitat Survey on near-natural streams and rivers in northern and western Europe. Marine and freshwater ecosystems, 20, 13–30.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1103>
34. ROZKOŠNÝ, M. et al. (2007): Výzkum vodních ekosystémů v rámci povodí. Závěrečná souhrnná zpráva projektu VaV/SL/8/59/04. Ministry of the environment of the Czech Republic, Brno.
35. , K., POPEK, Z. (2011): Analysis of the connections between hydromorphological conditions and biocenotic diversity on the example of the Zwoleńka River. Land Reclamation, 43, 173–184.
36. , V., MATOUŠKOVÁ, M., DVOŘÁK, M. (2010): Comparative analysis of selected hydromorphological assessment methods. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 169, 309–319.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1172-6>
37. , A., ANTONS, C., CRON, N., LORENZ, A. W., HERING, D., HAASE, P. (2011): Hydromorphological restoration of running waters: effects on benthic invertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology, 56, 1689–1702.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02599.x>
38. , R.L., MINSHALL, G.W., CUMMINS, K.W., SEDELL, J.R., CUSHING, C.E. (1980): The River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 130–137.
<https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017>
39. , I.P., DIAMOND, M., GURNELL, A.M., HALL, K.A., JENKINS, A., MILNER, N.J., NAYLOR, L.A., SEAR, D.A., WOODWARD, G., ORMEROD, S.J. (2009): Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management. Marine and freshwater ecosystems, 19, 113–125.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.895>
40. , P.F.M. (2000): Integrated ecological assessment methods as a basis for sustainable catchment management. Hydrobiologia, 422–423, 389–412.
<https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017094905369>
41. WADE, P.M., LARGE, A.G.R., DE WAAL, L.C. (2000): Rehabilitation of Rivers. Principles and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
42. Water Framework Directive. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the Council of 23st October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, I., 327/1, Luxemburg.
43. , A., MATOUŠKOVÁ, M., MATSCHULLAT, J. (2008): Hydromorphological assessment within the EU-Water Framework Directive – trans-boundary cooperation and application to different water basins. Hydrobiologia, 603, 53–72.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9247-2>
44. , M. (2006): Ecohydrology – an interdisciplinary tool for integrated protection and management of water bodies. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 158, 613–622.
45. , M. (2008): Rationale for the “Floodplain Declaration” from environmental conservation toward sustainability science. Ecohydrology & hydrobiology, 8, 107–113.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/v10104-009-0008-x>
