Geografie 2015, 120, 251-274
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120020251
Beyond gentrification: Diversified neighbourhood upgrading in the inner city of Budapest
References
1. ATKINSON, R., BRIDGE, G., eds. (2005): Gentrification in a Global Context. The new urban colonialism. Routledge, London.
2. , A., GOLUBCHIKOV, O. (2005): Gentrification in central Moscow: A market process or a deliberate policy? Money, power and people in housing regeneration in Ostozhenka, Geografiska Annaler B 87, pp. 113–129.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2005.00186.x>
3. BARTA, G., BELUSZKY, P., CZIRFUSZ, M., GYŐRI, R., KUKELY, G. (2006): Rehabilitating the Brownfield Zones of Budapest. Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Discussion Papers, 51. Pécs.
4. BEAUREGARD, R.A. (1986): The Chaos and Complexity of Gentrification. In: Smith, N., Williams, P. (eds.): Gentrification of the city. Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 35–55.
5. , P., TIMÁR, J. (1992): The changing political system and urban restructuring in Hungary, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 83, No. 5, pp. 380–390.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1992.tb00618.x>
6. , B.E., SZABÓ, B. (2009): Housing preferences and the image of inner city neighborhoods in Budapest. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 58, No. 3, pp. 201–214.
7. BERNT, M., HOLM, A. (2005): Exploring the substance and style of gentrification: Berlin’s “Prenzlberg”: In: Atkinson, R., Bridge, G. (eds.): Gentrification in a Global Context. The new urban colonialism, Routledge, London, pp. 106–120.
8. , M., HOLM, A. (2009): Is it, or is it not? The conceptualisation of gentrification and displacement and its political implications in the case of Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, CITY Special Issue. Cities for People, Not for Profit, 13, No. 2–3, pp. 312–324.
9. , I. (2010): Gentrifizierung im 21. Jahrhundert, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 17, pp. 27–32.
10. , J., LEES, L. (1995): Gentrification in New York, London and Paris: An International Comparison, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19, No. 2, pp. 286–303.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1995.tb00505.x>
11. CLAY, P.L. (1979): Neighbourhood Renewal. Middle-Class Resettlement and Incumbent Upgrading in American Neighborhoods. Lexington Books, Lexington.
12. DANGSCHAT, J.S. (1988): Gentrification: Der Wandel innenstadtnaher Wohnviertel. In: Friedrichs, J. (ed.): Soziologische Stadtforschung, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft, No. 29, Opladen, pp. 272–292.
13. , M., LEES, L. (2005) New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance, Environment and Planning A, 37, No. 7, pp. 1165–1190.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a3739>
14. , M., LEES, L. (2010): New-Build Gentrification: Its Histories, Trajectories, and Critical Geographies, Population, Space and Place. Special Issue: New Forms of Gentrification, 16, No. 5, pp. 395–411.
15. DÖRFLER, T. (2010): Gentrification in Prenzlauer Berg? Milieuwandel eines Berliner Sozialraumes seit 1989, Bielefeld.
16. , Z., KOVÁCS, Z. (2006): Budapest: Post-socialist metropolitan periphery between “catching up” and individual development path. European Spatial Research and Policy, 13, No. 2, pp. 23–41.
17. FÖLDI, Zs. (2006): Neighbourhood dynamics in inner-Budapest: a realist approach. Netherlands Geographical Studies No. 350, Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
18. , Zs., VAN WEESEP, J. (2007): Impacts of Globalisation at the Neighbourhood Level in Budapest, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22, No. 1, pp. 33–50.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9065-2>
19. , K. (2000): Gentrifizierung. Theoretische Ansätze und Anwendung auf Städte in den neuen Ländern, Geographische Rundschau, 52, No. 7–8, pp. 34–39.
20. FRIEDRICHS, J. (1996): Gentrification. Forschungsstand und Methodologische Probleme. In: Friedrichs, J., Kecskes, R. (eds.): Gentrification. Theorie und Forschungsergebnisse, Leske & Budrich, Opladen, pp. 13–40.
21. FRIEDRICHS, J., HÄUSSERMANN, H. (2001): Die Entwicklung der Städte in den neuen Bundesländern. In: Bertram, H., Kollmorgen, R. (eds): Die Transformation Ostdeutschlands. Berichte zum sozialen und politischen Wandel in den neuen Bundesländern, Leske & Budrich, Opladen, pp. 315–339.
22. GLASS, R. (1964): Aspects of Change. In: Centre for Urban Studies (ed.): London. Aspects of Change. Center for urban studies report, No. 3, pp. xviii–xix.
23. GLATTER, J. (2007): Gentrification in Ostdeutschland: untersucht am Beispiel der Dresdner Äußeren Neustadt. Dresdner Geographische Beiträge No. 11, Dresden, 233 pp.
24. , M. (2014): Unique or universal? Mechanisms and processes of social change in post-socialist Warsaw, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 63, No. 3, pp. 255–270.
<https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.63.3.2>
25. HAMMEL, D.J. (2009): Gentrification. In: Kitchin, R., Thrift, N. (eds): International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 4, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 360–367.
26. HAMNETT, C., RANDOLPH, B. (1986): Tenurial Transformation and the Flat Break-up Market in London: The British Condo Experience. In: Smith, N., Williams, P. (eds.): Gentrification of the City. Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 121–152.
27. HEGEDÜS, J., TOSICS, I. (1991): Gentrification in Eastern Europe: The case of Budapest. In: van Weesep, J., Musterd, S. (eds): Urban Housing for the Better-Off: Gentrification in Europe Stedelijke Netwerken, Utrecht, pp. 124–136.
28. , J., TOSICS, I. (1994): Privatisation and Rehabilitation in the Budapest Inner Districts. Housing Studies, 9, No. 1, pp. 39–54.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039408720774>
29. , A., WIEST, K. (2004): Gentrification in ostdeutschen Cityrandgebieten? Theoretische Überlegungen zum empirischen Forschungsstand, Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde, 78 No. 1, pp. 25–39.
30. HOLM, A. (2006): Die Restrukturierung des Raumes. Stadterneuerung der 90er Jahre in Ostberlin: Interessen und Machtverhältnisse. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, 352 pp.
31. , L. (2003): Family Gentrifiers: Challenging the City as a Place Simultaneously to Build a Career and to Raise Children. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2573–2584.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136228>
32. , T. (2007): An Analysis of Housing Location Attributes in the Inner City of Budapest, Hungary, Using Expert Judgments, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11, No. 4, pp. 209–225.
<https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2007.9637570>
33. KLEE, A. (2001): Der Raumbezug von Lebensstilen in der Stadt: Ein Diskurs über eine schwierige Beziehung mit empirischen Befunden aus der Stadt Nürnberg. L.I.S.-Verlag, Passau, 236 pp.
34. , H., KOVÁCS, Z. (1999): The process of suburbanization in the agglomeration of Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 14, No. 2, pp. 119–141.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496818>
35. , Z. (1998): Ghettoization or gentrification? Post-socialist scenarios for Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 13, No. 1, pp. 63–81.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496934>
36. , Z. (2009): Social and economic transformation of historical neighbourhoods in Budapest. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100, No. 4, pp. 399–416.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00549.x>
37. KOVÁCS, Z. (2012): Residential segregation in Budapest before and after transition. In: Maloutas, T., Fujita, K. (eds.): Residential segregation in comparative perspective: making sense of contextual diversity. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 197–216.
38. KOVÁCS, Z., WIESSNER, R. (1999): Stadt- und Wohnungsmarktentwicklung in Budapest. Zur Entwicklung der innerstädtischen Wohnquartiere im Transformationsprozess. Beiträge zur Regionalen Geographie, No. 48, Institut für Länderkunde, Leipzig, 81 pp.
39. , Z., WIESSNER, R., ZISCHNER, R. (2013): Urban renewal in the inner city of Budapest: Gentrification from a post-socialist perspective. Urban Studies, 50, No. 1, pp. 22–38.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012453856>
40. , Z., BĒRZIŅŠ, M. (2014): Intra-urban residential differentiation in the post-Soviet city: the case of Riga, Latvia. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 63, No. 3, pp. 235–253.
<https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.63.3.1>
41. , J. (1993): Patterns of residential segregation and the Gypsy minority in Budapest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17, No. 4, pp. 30–41.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1993.tb00210.x>
42. LADÁNYI, J. (2002): Residential Segregation among Social and Ethnic Groups in Budapest during the Post-communist Transition. In: Marcuse, P. van Kempen, R. (eds.): Of States and Cities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 170–182.
43. , L. (1994): Gentrification in London and New York: An Atlantic Gap? Housing Studies 9, No. 2, pp. 199–217.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039408720783>
44. , L. (2003): Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2487–2509.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136174>
45. LEES, L., SLATER, T., WYLY, E. (2008): Gentrification. Routledge, New York. 310 pp.
46. , D. (1980): Liberal Ideology and the Postindustrial City. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70, No. 2, pp. 238–258.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01310.x>
47. , D. (1981): Inner-City Revitalization in Canada: a Vancouver case study. Canadian Geographer, 25, No. 2, pp. 124–148.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.1981.25.2.124>
48. LEY, D. (1996): The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 248 pp.
49. , D. (2003): Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2527–2544.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136192>
50. , S. (2012): The evolution of spatial patterns of residential segregation in Central European cities: The Łódź functional urban region from mature socialism to mature post-socialism. Cities, 29, No. 5, pp. 300–309.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.008>
51. MURZYN, M. (2006): “Winners” and “Losers” in the Game: the Social Dimension of Urban Regeneration in the Kazimierz Quarter in Krakow. In: Enyedi, G., Kovács, Z. (eds.): Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres. Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs, pp. 81–106.
52. MUSTERD, S., OSTENDORF, W., eds. (1998): Urban Segregation and the Welfare State. Routledge, London, 275 pp.
53. , S., ANDERSSON, R. (2005): Housing mix, social, mix and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40, No. 6, pp. 761–790.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405276006>
54. , M. (1993): Rural Gentrification and the Processes of Class Colonisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, No. 2, pp. 123–140.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90026-G>
55. , M. (2002): Distant bodies? Rural studies, political-economy and poststructuralism. Sociologia Ruralis, 42, No. 2, pp. 81–105.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00204>
56. , M. (2005): Differential productions of rural gentrification: illustrations from North and South Norfolk. Geoforum, 36, No. 4, pp. 477–494.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.001>
57. , P., LEES, L. (2011): Spatial capital, gentrification and mobility: evidence from Swiss core cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, No. 1, pp. 126–142.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00404.x>
58. , P., SÖDERSTRÖM, O., PIGUET, E. (2010): New Forms of Gentrification: Issues and Debates. Population, Space and Place, 16, No. 5, pp. 335–343.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.585>
59. ROSE (1996) Economic restructuring and the diversification of gentrification in the 1980s: a view from a marginal metropolis. In: Caulfield, J., Peake, L. (eds.): City Lives and City Forms: Critical Research and Canadian Urbanism. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 131–172.
60. , N. (1979): Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, No. 4, pp. 538–548.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002>
61. SMITH, N. (1996): The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. Routledge, London, 288 pp.
62. , H., KRUPICKAITE, D. (2004): Gentrification in Vilnius (Lithuania) – the Example of Uzupis. Europa Regional 12, No. 1, pp. 42–51.
63. , L. (1999): Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal 49, No. 1, pp. 79–89.
<https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007076000411>
64. , L., BOUZAROVSKI, S. (2012): Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49, No. 1, pp. 43–60.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402>
65. , J., VÁRADI, M.M. (2001): The uneven development of suburbanization during transition in Hungary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8, No. 4, pp. 349–360.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640100800407>
66. TOSICS, I. (2005): The post-socialist Budapest: the invasion of market forces and the attempts of public leadership. In: Hamilton, F.E.I., Dimitrowska-Andrews, K., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (eds): Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards Globalization. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 248–280.
67. TOSICS, I. (2006): Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest. In: Tsenkova, S., Nedovic- Budic, Z. (eds): The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 131–150.
68. TWICKEL, C. (2010): Gentrifidingsbums oder eine Stadt für alle. Ed. Nautilus, Hamburg, 128 pp.
69. , M., DECROLY, J.-M. (2003) Revisiting the diversity of gentrification: Neighbourhood renewal processes in Brussels and Montreal. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2451–2468.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136156>
70. , R., BOLT, G. (2009): Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, No. 4, pp. 457–475.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9161-1>
71. WEISKE, C. (1996): Gentrification und Incumbent Upgrading in Erfurt. In: Friedrichs, J., Kecskes, R. (eds.): Gentrification. Theorie und Forschungsergebnisse. Leske & Budrich, Opladen, pp. 193–226.
72. , K., ZISCHNER, R. (2006): Aufwertung innerstädtischer Altbaugebiete in den neuen Bundesländern – Prozesse und Entwicklungspfade in Leipzig. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften, 45, No. 1, pp. 99–121.
73. WIESSNER, R. (1987): Wohnungsmodernisierungen – Ein behutsamer Weg der Stadterneuerung? Empirische Fallstudie in Altbauquartieren des Nürnberger Innenstadtrandgebiets. Münchner Geographische Hefte 54, Kallmünz, 278 pp.
74. , R. (1988): Probleme der Stadterneuerung und jüngerer Wohnungsmodernisierung in Altbauquartieren aus sozialgeographischer Sicht. Mit Beispielen aus Nürnberg, Geographische Rundschau, 40, No. 11, pp. 18–25.
75. , R., ZISCHNER, R. (2010): Revitalisierung großstädtischer Wohnquartiere und ihre sozialen Implikationen: Fallbeispiele aus Budapest. In: Kunze, C. (ed.): Wirtschaftlicher Aufholprozess und EU-Integration in Mittel- und Osteuropa – das europäische Wachstumsmodell in der Krise? Leipzig (= Transformation). Leipziger Beiträge zur Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 27/28, pp. 159–177.
76. ZISCHNER, R. (2003): Gentrification in Leipzig-Connewitz? Theoretische Gentrification- Ansätze und deren Gültigkeit in Städten der neuen Bundesländer. Thesis. Institut für Geographie Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, 184 pp.
77. ZISCHNER, R. (2013): Zur Frage der Gentrification in Städten Mittel- und Osteuropas – das Fallbeispiel Budapest. Innerstädtische Wohnquartiere von Budapest im baulichen und sozialen Wandel. Dissertation. Institut für Geographie Universität Leipzig. Leipzig, 262 pp.
78. , S. (1982): Loft living as “historic compromise” in the urban core: the New York experience. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6, No. 2, pp. 256–267.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1982.tb00577.x>
