Geografie 2015, 120, 134-163
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120020134
Newbuild gentrification, tele-urbanization and urban growth: placing the cities of the post-Communist South in the gentrification debate
References
1. ALEXANDER, C., BUCHLI, V., HUMPHREY, C. (2007): Urban life in post-Soviet Asia. UCL Press, London, 212 pp.
2. ÅSLUND, A. (2002): Building Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 508 pp.
3. , A., GOLUBCHIKOV, O. (2005): Gentrification in central Moscow – a market process or a deliberate policy? Money, power and people in housing regeneration in Ostozhenka. Geografiska Annaler B, 87, No. 1, pp. 113–129.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2005.00186.x>
4. BATER, J. (1980): The Soviet City. Edward Arnold, London, 196 pp.
5. BEAUREGARD, R. (1986): The Chaos and Complexity of Gentrification. In: Smith, N., Williams, P. (eds.): Gentrification of the City. Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 35–55.
6. , M. (2012): The “Double Movements” of Neighbourhood Change: Gentrification and Public Policy in Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg. Urban Studies, No. 49, pp. 3045–3062.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012437746>
7. , M., HOLM, A. (2009): Is it, or is not? The conceptualisation of gentrification and displacement and its political implications in the case of Berlin‐Prenzlauer Berg. City, 13, No. 2–3, pp. 312–324.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982268>
8. , M. (2007): Designer neighbourhoods: new-build residential development in nonmetropolitan UK citiesöthe case of Bristol. Environment and Planning A, 39, pp. 86–105.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a39144>
9. , T., GENTILE, M. (2007): Metropolitan Processes In Post-Communist States: An Introduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89, No. 2, pp. 95–110.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00242.x>
10. , S., SALUKVADZE, J., GENTILE, M. (2011): A Socially Resilient Urban Transition? The Contested Landscapes of Apartment Building Extensions in Two Postcommunist Cities. Urban Studies, 48, No. 13, pp. 2689–2714.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010385158>
11. , G. (2006): It’s not just a question of taste: gentrification, the neighbourhood, and cultural capital. Environment and Planning A, 38, No. 10, pp. 1965–1978.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a3853>
12. , T. (2007): Re-urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, No. 4, pp. 759–781.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00758.x>
13. , T., LEES, L. (2006): Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: globalization and gentrifying global elites at the neighbourhood level. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, No. 4, pp. 467–487.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00220.x>
14. , T., ROBSON, G. (2001): Social Capital, Gentrification and Neighbourhood Change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38, No. 12, pp. 2145–2162.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087090>
15. , S., HALL, R., OGDEN, P.E. (2007): Beyond gentrification: the demographic reurbanisation of Bologna. Environment and Planning A, 39, No. 1, pp. 64–85.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a39109>
16. CHELCEA, L. (2006): Marginal Groups in Central Places: Gentrification, Property Rights and Post-socialist Primitive Accumulation. In: Enyédi, G., Kovács, Z. (eds.): Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The Case of Central Europe Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Science, Pécs, pp. 127–145.
17. CHOI, N. (2014): Metro Manila through the gentrification lens: Disparities in urban planning and displacement risks. Urban Studies, pre-published online.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014543032>
18. DARIEVA, T. (2011): A Remarkable Gift in a Post-colonial City. The Past and Present of the Baku. Promenade. In: Darieva, T, Kaschuba, W., Krebs, M. (eds.): Urban Spaces After Socialism – Ethnographies of Public Places in Eurasian Citie. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 153–178.
19. DARIEVA, T., KASCHUBA, W., KREBS, M. (2011): Urban Spaces After Socialism – Ethnographies of Public Places in Eurasian Cities. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 325 pp.
20. , M. (2007): Gentrification as global habitat: a process of class formation or corporate creation? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32, No. 4, pp. 490–506.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00269.x>
21. , M. (2008): Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-led “Positive” Gentrification End? Urban Studies, 45, No. 12, pp. 2385–2405.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008097105>
22. , M. (2010): Love they neighbour? Social mixing in London’s gentrification frontier. Environment and Planning A, 42, No. 3, pp. 524–544.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a41379>
23. , M., LEES, L. (2005): New-build gentrification and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, 37, No. 7, pp. 1165–1190.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a3739>
24. , M., LEES, L. (2010): New-build gentrification: its histories, trajectories, and critical geographies. Population, Space and Place, 16, No. 5, pp. 395–411.
25. , A. (1999): Budapest’s built environment in transition. Geojournal, 49, pp. 63–78.
<https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007080111774>
26. , B. (2009): Living through gentrification: subjective experiences of local, nongentrifying residents in Leith, Edinburgh. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, No. 3, pp. 299–315.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9151-3>
27. , B., VAN KEMPEN, R., VAN WEESEP, J. (2011): ‘We’re a rich city with poor people’: municipal strategies of new-build gentrification in Rotterdam and Glasgow. Environment and Planning A, 43, No. 6, pp. 1438–1454.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a43470>
28. ECONOMIST (2010): A new look for old Tbilisi. 6 October.
29. EDWARDS, M. (2011): London for sale: towards the radical marketization of urban space. In: Gandy, M. (ed.): Urban constellations. Jovis, Berlin, pp. 54–57.
30. FLORIDA, R. (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York, 404 pp.
31. , L. (2008): Comment on ‘The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32, No. 1, pp. 186–191.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00771.x>
32. , L. (2009): Neighbourhood Diversity, Metropolitan Segregation and Gentrification: What Are the Links in the US? Urban Studies, 46, No. 10, pp. 2079–2101.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009339426>
33. , L., BRACONI, F. (2004): Gentrification and displacement: New York City in the 1990s. American Planning Association, 70, No. 1, pp. 39–52.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976337>
34. FRENCH, A. (1995): Plans, pragmatism and people. UCL Press, London, 256 pp.
35. GARCIA-ZAMOR, J. (2014): Strategies for Urban Development in Leipzig, Germany. Springer, New York, 128 pp.
36. , M., SJÖBERG, Ö. (2010): Spaces of Priority: The Geography of Soviet Housing Construction in Daugavpils, Latvia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, No. 1, pp. 112–136.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903378994>
37. GLASS, R. (1964): Introduction: Aspects of Change. In: Centre for Urban Studies (ed.): London: Aspects of Change. McKibbon and Kee, London, pp. xiii-xlii.
38. , O., BADYINA, A., MAKHROVA, A. (2014): The hybrid spatialities of transition: capitalism, legacy and uneven urban economic restructuring. Urban Studies, 51 No. 4, pp. 617–633.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013493022>
39. GRUBBAUER, M. (2012): Toward a more comprehensive notion of urban change: linking post-socialist urbanism and urban theory. In: Grubbauer, M., Kusiak, J. (eds.), Chasing Warsaw: Socio-Material Dynamics of Urban Change since 1990. Campus verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 35–60.
40. , A., GROSSMANN, K., STEINFÜHRER, A. (2012): Transitory urbanites: New actors of residential change in Polish and Czech inner cities. Cities, 29, No. 5, pp. 318–326.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.006>
41. , J., SMITH, N. (2001): The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 92, No. 4, pp. 464-477.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00172>
42. , C. (1991): The Blind Men and the Elephant: The Explanation of Gentrification. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 16, No. 2, pp. 173–189.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/622612>
43. , C. (2009): The new Mikado? Tom Slater, gentrification and displacement. City, 13, No. 4, pp. 476–482.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810903298672>
44. HEGEDÜS, J., TOSICS, I. (1991): Gentrification in Eastern Europe: The case of Budapest. In: van Weesep, J., Musterd, S. (eds.): Urban Housing for the Better-Off: Gentrification in Europe. Stedelijke Netwerken, Utrecht, pp. 124–136.
45. , S. (2007): Suburbanizing Sofia: characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. Urban Geography, 28, No. 8, pp. 755–780.
<https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.28.8.755>
46. , A., MARCIŃCZAK, S., OGRODOWCZYK, A. (2015): New-build gentrification in the post-socialist city: Łódź and Leipzig two decades after socialism. Geografie, 120, No. 2, pp. 164–187.
47. JONES LANG LASALLE, INSTITUTE OF POLLING AND MARKETING. (2012): Georgian Real Estate Market Overview 2012: Residential Market Report. JLL & IPM, Tbilisi.
48. , P., MITCHNECK, B., MAYOROVA, O. V., REGULSKA, J. (2014): The Multiple Geographies of Internal Displacement: The Case of Georgia. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 33, No. 4, pp. 1–30.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdu012>
49. , N., HAASE, D., HAASE, A. (2010): Evolving Reurbanisation? Spatio-temporal Dynamics as Exemplified by the East German City of Leipzig. Urban Studies, 47, No. 5, pp. 967–990.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353072>
50. KOCH, N. (2015): The violence of spectacle: Statist schemes to green the desert and constructing Astana and Ashgabat as urban oases. Social and Cultural Geography. Pre-published online.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.1001431>
51. , Z. (1998): Ghettoization or gentrification? Post-socialist scenarios for Budapest. Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment, 13, No. 1, pp. 63–81.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496934>
52. , Z., WIESSNER, R., ZISCHNER, R. (2013): Urban Renewal in the Inner City of Budapest: Gentrification from a Post-socialist Perspective. Urban Studies, 50, No. 1, pp. 22–38.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012453856>
53. , Z., WIESSNER, R., ZISCHNER, R. (2015): Beyond gentrification: Diversified upgrading in the inner-city of Budapest. Geografie, 120, No. 2, pp. 250–273.
54. , L. (2012): The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism. Progress in Human Geography, 36, No. 2, pp. 155–171.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511412998>
55. , C. (2014): Hybrid gentrification in South Africa: Theorising across southern and northern cities. Urban Studies, 51, No. 14, pp. 2943–2960.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013515030>
56. MANNING, P. (2009): The Hotel/Refugee Camp Iveria: Symptom, Monster, Fetish, Home. In: van Assche, K., Salukvadze, J., Shavishvili, N. (eds.): Urban Culture and Urban Planning in Tbilisi: Where West and East Meet. Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, pp. 319–349.
57. , S., GENTILE, M., RUFAT, S., CHELCEA, L. (2014): Urban Geographies of Hesitant Transition: Tracing Socioeconomic Segregation in Post-Ceauşescu Bucharest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, No. 4, pp. 1399–1417.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12073>
58. , S., GENTILE, M., STĘPNIAK, M. (2013): Paradoxes of (Post)Socialist Segregation: Metropolitan Sociospatial Divisions Under Socialism and After In Poland. Urban Geography, 34, No. 3, pp. 327–352.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778667>
59. MARCIŃCZAK, S., MUSTERD, S., VAN HAM, M., TAMMARU, T. (2015): Inequality and rising levels of socio-economic segregation: lessons from a pan-European comparative study. In: Tammaru, T., van Ham, M., Marcińczak, S., Musterd, S. (eds.): Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities – East Meets West. Routledge, London, in press.
60. , S., SAGAN, I. (2011): The Socio-spatial Restructuring of Łódź, Poland. Urban Studies, 48, No. 9, pp. 1789–1809.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010379276>
61. MURZYN, M. (2006): “Winners” and “Losers” in the Game: the Social Dimension of Urban Regeneration in the Kazimierz quarter in Krakow. In: Enyédi, G., Kovács, Z. (eds.): Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The Case of Central Europe Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Science, Pécspp, pp. 81–106.
62. MURZYN, M. (2008): Heritage Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Graham, B., Howard, P. (eds.): The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity. Ashgate, Aldershotpp, pp. 315–346.
63. NAGY, E., TIMÁR, J. (2012): Urban restructuring in the grip of capital and politics: Gentrification in East-Central Europe. In: Csapó, T., Balogh, A. (eds.): Development of the Settlement Network in the Central European Countries: Past, Present and Future. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 121–135.
64. , S., IVLEVS, A., GENTILE, M. (2009): The Impact of Global Economic Crisis on Remittances in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50, No. 4, pp. 447–463.
<https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.50.4.447>
65. , M. (2007): Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler B, 89, No. 2, pp. 111–126.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x>
66. , M. (1993): Rural gentrification and the processes of class colonisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, No. 2, pp. 123–140.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90026-G>
67. , M. (2004): Other geographies of gentrification. Progress in Human Geography, 28, No. 1, pp. 5–30.
<https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph458oa>
68. , P., SÖDERSTRÖM, O., PIGUET, E. (2010): New forms of gentrification: issues and debates. Population, Space and Place, 16, No. 5, pp. 335–343.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.585>
69. , J. (2002): Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26, No. 3, pp. 513–554.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00397>
70. ROBINSON, J. (2006): Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. Routledge, Abingdon, 224 pp.
71. , J. (2011): Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, No. 1, pp. 1–23.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x>
72. , D. (2010): Local state policy and “new-build gentrification” in Montréal: the role of the “population factor” in a fragmented governance context. Population, Space and Place, 16, No. 5, pp. 413–428.
73. SAGAN, I., GRABKOWSKA, M. (2013): Negotiating Participatory Regeneration in the Postsocialist Inner City. In: Leary, M.E., Mccarthy, J. (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration. Blackwell, London, New York, pp. 433–442.
74. SALUKVADZE, J., SICHINAVA, D., GOGISHVILI, D. (2013): Socio-economic and Spatial Factors of Alienation and Segregation of Internally Displaced Persons in the Cities of Georgia. In: Marszał, T., Pielesiak, I. (eds): Spatial Inequality and Cohesion, Studia Regionalia, 38, pp. 45–60.
75. , D. (2011): Situating Slums. City, 15, No. 6, pp. 674–685.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.609011>
76. , Ö. (2014): Cases onto themselves? Theory and research on ex-socialist urban environments. Geografie, 119, No. 4, pp. 299–319.
77. , T. (2006): The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, No. 4, pp. 737–757.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00689.x>
78. , T. (2009): Missing Marcuse: On gentrification and displacement’. City, 13, No. 2–3, pp. 293–311.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982250>
79. , T. (2010): Still missing Marcuse: Hamnett’s foggy analysis in London town. City, 14, No. 1–2, pp. 170–179.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13604811003633719>
80. , N. (1979): Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, No. 4, pp. 538–548.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002>
81. , N. (2002): New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy. Antipode, 34, No. 3, pp. 427–450.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00249>
82. , F. (2014): New-Build Gentrification and the Everyday Displacement of Polish Immigrant Tenants in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Antipode, 46, No. 3, pp. 794–815.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12074>
83. , A., HAASE, A. (2007): Demographic changes as a future challenge for cities in East Central Europe. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89, No. 2, pp. 183–195.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00247.x>
84. , L. (1993): City in Transition: The Role of Rent Gaps in Prague’s Revitalization. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 84, No. 4, pp. 281–293.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1993.tb01770.x>
85. , L. (1999): Changes in the internal structure of postcommunist Prague. Geojournal, 49, No. 1, pp. 79–89.
<https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007076000411>
86. SÝKORA, L. (2005): Gentrification in post-communist cities. In: Atkinson, R., Bridge, G. (eds.): Gentrification in Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. Routledge, London, pp. 90–105.
87. , L., BOUZAROVSKI, S. (2012): Multiple Transformations: Conceptualising the Post-communist Urban Transition. Urban Studies, 49, No. 1, pp. 43–60.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402>
88. SZELÉNYI, I. (1996): Cities under socialism – and after. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelényi, I. (eds.): Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 286–317.
89. SZIRMAI, V. (2006): Socially Sustainable Urban Development in the Historic Urban Centres of East Central Europe. In: Enyédi, G., Kovács, Z. (eds.): Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The Case of Central Europe. Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Science, Pécs, pp. 20–38.
90. , T. (2005): Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Environment and Planning A, 37, No. 9, pp. 1669–1687.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a37118>
91. , J. (2007): Flagship developments and the physical upgrading of the postsocialist inner city: the Golden Angel project in Prague. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89, No. 2, pp. 169–181.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00246.x>
92. , J., DVOŘÁKOVÁ, N. (2012): Residential satisfaction of elderly in the city centre: The case of revitalizing neighbourhoods in Prague. Cities, 29, No. 5, pp. 310–317.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.015>
93. , A. (2013): Baku. Cities, 31, No. 4, pp. 625–640.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.004>
94. , K., SALUKVADZE, J. (2012): Tbilisi reinvented: planning, development and the unfinished project of democracy in Georgia. Planning Perspectives, 27, No. 1, pp. 1–24.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2011.601611>
95. , R., MURIE, A. (2009): The new divided city: changing patterns in European cities. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 100, No. 4, pp. 377–398.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00548.x>
96. , O. (1997): Transformation Processes in Moscow and Intra-Urban Stratification of Population. Geojournal, 42, No. 4, pp. 349–363.
<https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006890108182>
97. , L. (2004): Critical Thought as Solvent of Doxa. Constellations, 11, No. 1, pp. 97–101.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1351-0487.2004.00364.x>
98. , L. (2008): Relocating gentrification: the working class, science and the state in recent urban research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32, No. 1, pp. 198–205.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00774.x>
