Geografie 2014, 119, 299-319

https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2014119040299

Cases onto themselves? Theory and research on ex-socialist urban environments

Örjan Sjöberg

Stockholm School of Economics, PO Box 6501, SE-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden

Received December 2013
Accepted October 2014

References

1. ADAMS, L.L. (2010): The Spectacular State: Culture and National Identity in Uzbekistan. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 242 pp.
2. AMIN, A., GRAHAM, S. (1997): The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 22, No. 4, pp. 411–429. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00411.x>
3. APPADURAI, A. (1996): Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 248 pp.
4. BAPTISTA, I. (2013): The travels of critiques of neoliberalism: urban experiences for the “borderlands”. Urban Geography, 34, No. 5, pp. 590–611. <https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.780398>
5. BATER, J.H. (1980): The Soviet City: Ideal and Reality. Edward Arnold, London, 196 pp.
6. BECKER, T. (1989): Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 200 pp.
7. BENJAMIN, W. ([1935] 1969): Paris: capital of the Nineteenth Century. Perspecta 12, pp. 163–172. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1566965>
8. BERNT, M., HAASE, A., GROßMANN, K., COCKS, M., COUCH, C., CORTESE, C., KRYSZTOFIK, R. (2014): How does(n’t) urban shrinkage get onto the agenda? Experiences from Leipzig, Liverpool, Genoa and Bytom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, No. 5, pp. 1749–1766. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12101>
9. BORÉN, T., GENTILE, M. (2007): Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: an introduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89, No. 2, pp. 95–110. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00242.x>
10. BRENNER, N., THEODORE, N. (2002): Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34, No. 3, pp. 349–379. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246>
11. BUZAR, S., OGDEN, P., HALL, R., HAASE, A., KABISCH, S., STEINFÜHRER, A. (2007): Splintering urban populations: emergent landscapes of reurbanisation in four European cities. Urban Studies, 44, No. 4, pp. 651–677. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601185544>
12. CHAN, K.W. (1994): Cities with Invisible Walls: Reinterpreting Urbanization in Post-1949 China. Oxford University Press, New York, 193 pp.
13. CRANG, N. (2006): From neoliberalism to neoliberalisation: consolations, confusions, and necessary illusions. Environment and Planning A, 38, No. 1, pp. 1–6.
14. CZEPCZYŃSKI, M. (2008): Cultural Landscapes of Post-socialist Cities: Representation of Powers and Needs. Ashgate, Aldershot, 224 pp.
15. DIENER, A.C., HAGEN, J. (2013): From socialist to post-socialist cities: narrating the nation through urban space. Nationalities Papers, 41, No. 4, pp. 487–514. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.768217>
16. ENYEDI, G. (1996): Urbanization under socialism. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (eds): Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 100–118.
17. FERENČUHOVÁ, S. (2012): Urban theory beyond the “East/West divide”? Cities and urban research in postsocialist Europe. In: Edensor, T., Jayne, M. (eds): Urban Theory beyond the West: a World of Cities. Routledge, London, pp. 65–74.
18. GĄDECKI, J. (2012): Gating Warsaw: enclosed housing estates and the aesthetics of luxury. In: Grubbauer, M., Kusiak, J. (eds): Chasing Warsaw: Socio-Material Dynamics of Urban Change since 1990. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 109–132.
19. GENTILE, M. (2003): Residential segregation in a medium-sized post-Soviet city: Ust’-Kame nogorsk, Kazakhstan. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94, No. 5, pp. 589–605. <https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9663.2003.00285.x>
20. GENTILE, M. (2004): Divided post-Soviet small cities? Residential segregation and urban form. Iin: Leninogorsk, Zyryanovsk: Kazakhstan. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86, No. 2, pp. 117–136. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00157.x>
21. GENTILE, M., SJÖBERG, Ö. (2006): Intra-urban landscapes of priority: the Soviet legacy. Europe-Asia Studies, 58, No. 5, pp. 701–729. <https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130600731268>
22. GENTILE, M., SJÖBERG, Ö. (2010): Spaces of priority: the geography of Soviet housing construction in Daugavpils, Latvia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, No. 1, pp. 112–136. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903378994>
23. GENTILE, M., SJÖBERG, Ö. (2013): Housing allocation under socialism: the Soviet case revisited. Post-Soviet Affairs, 29, No. 2, pp. 173–195. <https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2013.782685>
24. GENTILE, M., TAMMARU, T., VAN KEMPEN, R. (2012): Heteropolitanization: social and spatial change in Central and East European cities. Cities, 29, No. 5, pp. 291–299. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.005>
25. GIBSON-GRAHAM, J.K. (2004): Area studies after poststructuralism. Environment and Planning A, 36, No. 3, pp. 405–419. <https://doi.org/10.1068/a3652>
26. GOLUBCHIKOV, O., PHELPS, N.A. (2011): The political economy of place at the post-socialist urban periphery: governing growth on the edge of Moscow. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 36, No. 3, pp. 425–440. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00427.x>
27. GOLUBCHIKOV, O., BADYINA, A., MAKHROVA, A. (2014): The hybrid spatialities of transition: capitalism, legacy and uneven urban economic restructuring. Urban Studies, 51, No. 4, pp. 617–633. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013493022>
28. GOTTDIENER, M., COLLINS, C.C., DICKENS, D.R. (1999): Las Vegas: The Social Production of the All-American City. Blackwell, Malden, MA, 304 pp.
29. GROßMANN, K., BONTJE, M., HAASE, A., MYKHENKO, V. (2013): Shrinking cities: notes for the further research agenda. Cities, 35, pp. 221–225. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.007>
30. GRUBBAUER, M. (2012): Toward a more comprehensive notion of urban change: linking post-socialist urbanism and urban theory. In: Grubbauer, M., Kusiak, J. (eds): Chasing Warsaw: Socio-Material Dynamics of Urban Change since 1990. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 35–60.
31. GRUBBAUER, M., KUSIAK, J., eds. (2012a): Chasing Warsaw: Socio-Material Dynamics of Urban Change since 1990. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, 336 pp.
32. GRUBBAUER, M., KUSIAK, J. (2012b): Introduction: chasing Warsaw. In: Grubbauer, M., Kusiak, J. (eds): Chasing Warsaw: Socio-Material Dynamics of Urban Change since 1990. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 9–24.
33. HALLE, D. (2003): The New York and Los Angeles schools. In: Halle, D. (ed.): New York and Los Angeles: Politics, Society, and Culture – a Comparative View. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–46.
34. HARRIS, R. (2010): Meaningful types in a world of suburbs. In: Clapson, M., Hutchison, R. (eds): Suburbanization in Global Society. Emerald, Bingley, pp. 15–47.
35. HARVEY, D. (2003): Paris, Capital of Modernity. Routledge, London, 372 pp.
36. FRENCH, R.A., HAMILTON, F.E. I., eds. (1979): The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy. Wiley, Chichester, 541 pp.
37. HANNAH, M.G. (2013): Attention and the phenomenological politics of landscape. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95, No. 3, pp. 235–250. <https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12023>
38. HIRT, S. (2012): Iron Curtains: Gates, Suburbs and Privatization of Space in the Post- Socialist City. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 239 pp.
39. HIRT, S. (2013): Whatever happened to the (post)socialist city? Cities, 32, No. S1, pp. S29–S38. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.010>
40. HLADÍK, R. (2011): A theory’s travelogue: post-colonial theory in post-socialist space. Teorie vědy, 33, No. 4, pp. 561–590.
41. HÖRSCHELMANN, K. (2002): History after the end: post-socialist difference in a (post)modern world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 27, No. 1, pp. 52–66. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00041>
42. HÖRSCHELMANN, K., STENNING, A. (2008): Ethnographies of postsocialist change. Progress in Human Geography, 32, No. 3, pp. 339–361. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508089094>
43. HOSPERS, G.-J. (2013): Coping with shrinkage in Europe’s cities and towns. Urban Design International, 18, No. 1, pp. 78–89. <https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.29>
44. JACOBS, J.M. (1996): Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City. Routledge, London, 193 pp.
45. JAYNE, M., FERENČUHOVÁ, S. (forthcoming): Comfort, identity and fashion in the postsocialist city: materialities, assemblages and context. Journal of Consumer Culture. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513498613>
46. JENCKS, C. (1993): Heteropolis: Los Angeles, the Riots and the Strange Beauty of Hetero- Architecture. Academy Editions, London, 144 pp.
47. KUBEŠ, J. (2013): European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland in intra-urban geography literature. Bulletin of Geography, Socio-Economic Series, 19, pp. 19–43. <https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2013-0002>
48. KUSIAK, J. (2012): The cunning chaos and its orders: a taxonomy of urban chaos in post-socialit Warsaw and beyond. In: Grubbauer, M., Kusiak, J. (eds): Chasing Warsaw: Socio-Material Dynamics of Urban Change since 1990. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 291–320.
49. LEETMAA, K., TAMMARU, T., ANNISTE, K. (2009): From priority-led to market-led suburbanisation in a post-communist metropolis. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100, No. 4, pp. 436–453. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00551.x>
50. LIGHT, D., YOUNG, C. (2010): Reconfiguring socialist urban landscapes: the “left-over” spaces of state-socialism in Bucharest. Human Geographies, 4, No. 1, pp. 5–16.
51. LISIAK, A. (2009): Disposable and usable pasts in Central European cities. Culture Unbound, 1, pp. 431–452. <https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.09125431>
52. LISIAK, A. (2010a): Urban Cultures in (Post)Colonial Central Europe. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN, 232 pp.
53. LISIAK, A. (2010b): The making of (post)colonial cities in Central Europe. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 12, No. 1, art. 3.
54. LIU, Y., HE, S., WU, F. (2012): Housing differentiation under market transition in Nanjing, China. Professional Geographer, 64, No. 4, pp. 554–571. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2011.614565>
55. MADRAZO, B., VAN KEMPEN, R. (2012): Explaining divided cities in China. Geoforum, 43, No. 1, pp. 158–168. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.004>
56. MARCIŃCZAK, S., GENTILE, M., STĘPNIAK, M. (2013): Paradoxes of (post)socialist segregation: metropolitan sociospatial divisions under socialism and after in Poland. Urban Geography, 34, No. 3, pp. 327–352. <https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778667>
57. MARCIŃCZAK, S., GENTILE, M., RUFAT, S., CHELCEA, L. (2014): Urban geographies of hesitant transition: tracing socioeconomic segregation in post-Ceauşescu Bucharest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, No. 4, pp. 1399–1417. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12073>
58. MARCIŃCZAK, S., MUSTERD, S., STĘPNIAK, M. (2012): Where the grass is greener: social segregation in three major Polish cities at the beginning of the 21st century. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19, No. 4, pp. 383–403. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411428496>
59. MCCANN, E., ROY, A., WARD, K. (2013): Assembling/wordling cities. Urban Geography, 34, No. 5, pp. 581–598. <https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.793905>
60. MCFARLANE, C. (2010): The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, No. 4, pp. 725–742. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00917.x>
61. MCFARLANE, C. (2011): Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15, No. 2, pp. 204–224. <https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568715>
62. MELS, T., GERMUNDSSON, T. (2013): Figures in the revolutionary landscape: an introduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95, No. 3, pp. 213–218. <https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12021>
63. MITCHELL, D. (2008): New axioms for reading the landscape: paying attention to political economy and social justice. In: Wescoat, J.L., jr, Johnston, D.M. (eds): Political Economies of Landscape Change: Places of Integrative Power. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 29–50.
64. MITCHELL, D. (2013): Labour’s geography and geography’s labour: California as an (anti-)revolutionary landscape. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95, No. 3, pp. 219–233. <https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12022>
65. MOORE, D.C. (2001): Is the post- in postcolonial the post- in post-Soviet? Toward a global postcolonial critique. PMLA, 116, No. 1, pp. 111–128.
66. MURRAY, P., SZELENYI, I. (1984): The city in the transition to socialism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 8, No. 1, pp. 89–107. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1984.tb00415.x>
67. MUSIL, J. (2005): Why socialist and post-socialist cities are important for forward looking urban studies. Paper prepared for the conference Forward look on urban science, Helsinki, 26–28 May.
68. MYERS, G. (2011): African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice. Zed, London, 242 pp.
69. NAWRATEK, K. (2012): Urban landscape and the postsocialist city. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 14, No. 3, art. 10.
70. NIJMAN, J. (1997): Globalization to a Latin beat: the Miami growth machine. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 551, pp. 164–177. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716297551001012>
71. ONG, A. (2011): Introduction: worlding cities, or the art of being global. In: Roy, A., Ong, A. (eds): Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1–26.
72. PARNELL, S., ROBINSON, J. (2012): (Re)theorizing cities from the global South: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33, No. 4, pp. 593–617. <https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593>
73. PIXOVÁ, M. (2013): Spaces of alternative culture in Prague in a time of political-economic changes of the city. Geografie, 118, No. 3, pp. 221–242.
74. ROBINSON, J. (2002): Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26, No. 3, pp. 513–554. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00397>
75. ROBINSON, J. (2003): Postcolonizing geography: tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24, No. 3, pp. 273–289. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9493.00159>
76. ROBINSON, J. (2006): Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. Routledge, London, 204 pp.
77. ROBINSON, J. (2011): Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, No. 1, pp. 1–23. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x>
78. ROWLANDS, R., MUSTERD, S., VAN KEMPEN, R., eds. (2009): Mass Housing in Europe: Multiple Faces of Development, Change and Response. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 285 pp.
79. ROY, A. (2009): The 21st-century metropolis: new geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43, No. 6, pp. 819–830. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701809665>
80. ROY, A. (2011a): Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning. Planning Theory, 10, No. 1, pp. 6–15. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210386065>
81. ROY, A. (2011b): Conclusion. Postcolonial urbanism: speed, hysteria, mass dreams. In: Roy, A., Ong, A. (eds): Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Wiley- Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 307–335.
82. ROY, A., ONG, A., eds. (2011): Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 352 pp.
83. RUBLE, B.A. (2001): Second Metropolis: Pragmatic Pluralism in Gilded Age Chicago, Silver Age Moscow, and Meiji Osaka. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 464 pp.
84. SIDAWAY, J.D. (2013): Geography, globalization, and the problematic of area studies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, No. 4, pp. 984–1002. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.660397>
85. SIMONE, A. (2001): On the worlding of African cities. African Studies Review, 44, No. 2, pp. 15–41. <https://doi.org/10.2307/525573>
86. SIMONE, A. (2010): City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads. Routledge, London, 403 pp.
87. SJÖBERG, Ö. (1999): Shortage, priority and urban growth: towards a theory of urbanisation under central planning. Urban Studies, 36, No. 13, pp. 2217–2236. <https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098992395>
88. SMITH, D.M. (1996): The socialist city. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (eds): Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 70–99.
89. SNOCHOWSKA-GONZALES, C. (2012): Post-colonial Poland – on an unavoidable misuse. East European Politics and Societies, 26, No. 4, pp. 708–723. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325412448473>
90. SOJA, E.W. (1996): Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Blackwell, Oxford, 334 pp.
91. SPIVAK, G.C. (1985): Three women’s texts and a critique of imperialism. Critical Inquiry, 12, No. 1, pp. 235–261. <https://doi.org/10.1086/448328>
92. STANILOV, K. (2007): Democracy, market, and public space in the transitional societies of Central and Eastern Europe. In: Stanilov, K. (ed.): The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 269–283.
93. STENNING, A. (2005): Post-socialism and the changing geographies of the everyday in Poland. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 30, No. 1, pp. 113–127. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00155.x>
94. STENNING, A., SMITH, A., ROCHOVSKÁ, A., ŚWIĄTEK, D. (2010): Domesticating Neo- Liberalism: Spaces of Economic Practice and Social Reproduction in Post-Socialist Cities. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 304 pp.
95. SÝKORA, L. (1994): Local urban restructuring as a mirror of globalisation processes. Urban Studies, 31, No. 7, pp. 1149–1166. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989420081001>
96. SÝKORA, L. (2009): Post-socialist cities. In: Kitchin, R., Thrift, N. (eds): International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 8, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 387–395.
97. SÝKORA, L., BOUZAROVSKI, S. (2012): Multiple transformations: conceptualising the postcommunist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49, No. 1, pp. 43 –60. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402>
98. SÝKORA, L., STANILOV, K. (2014): The challenge of postsocialist suburbanization. In: Stanilov, K., Sýkora, L. (eds): Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 1–23 pp.
99. SZELENYI, I. (1996): Cities under socialism – and after. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. (eds): Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 286–317.
100. TAŞAN-KOK, T. (2006): Institutional and spatial change. In: Tsenkova, S., Nedović-Budić, Z. (eds): The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Physical-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 51–70.
101. TEMELOVÁ, J., NOVÁK, J., OUŘEDNÍČEK, M., PULDOVÁ, P. (2011): Housing estates in the Czech Republic after socialism: various trajectories and inner differentiation. Urban Studies, 48, No. 9, pp. 1811–1834. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010379279>
102. THRIFT, N., FORBES, D. (1986): The Price of War: Urbanization in Vietnam, 1954–85. Allen and Unwin, London, 188 pp.
103. TOSICS, I. (2003): City Development in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990: the impacts of internal forces. In: Hamilton, F.E.I., Dimitrowska-Andrews, K., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (eds): Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards Globalisation. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 44–78.
104. TSENKOVA, S. (2006): Beyond transitions: understanding urban change in post-socialist cities. In: Tsenkova, S., Nedović-Budić, Z. (eds): The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 22–50.
105. TSENKOVA, S. (2012): Urban planning and informal cities in Southeast Europe. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 29, No. 4, pp. 292–305.
106. VAN KEMPEN, R., DEKKER, K., HALL, S., TOSICS, I., eds. (2005): Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe. Polity, Bristol, 392 pp.
107. VENDINA, O.I. (1998): Transformation processes in Moscow and intra-urban stratification of population. GeoJournal, 42, No. 4, pp. 349–363. <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006890108182>
108. VENTURI, R., SCOTT BROWN, D., IZENOUR, S. (1977): Learning from Las Vegas: The Forgotten Symbolism of Architectural Form. 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 192 pp.
109. WASSERSTROM, J. N. (2007): Is global Shanghai “good to think”? Thoughts on comparative history and post-socialist cities. Journal of World History, 18, No. 2, pp. 199–234. <https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2007.0016>
110. WIECHMANN, T., PALLAGST, K.M. (2012): Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: a comparison of transformation patterns and local strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, No. 2, pp. 261–280. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01095.x>
111. WIEST, K. (2012): Comparative debates in post-socialist urban studies. Urban Geography 33, No. 6, pp. 829–849. <https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.6.829>
112. ZHANG, L., ZHAO, S. X. (2003): Reinterpretation of China’s under-urbanization: a systemic perspective. Habitat International, 27, No. 3, pp. 459–483. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00071-1>
front cover

ISSN 1212-0014 (Print) ISSN 2571-421X (Online)

Archive