Geografie 2012, 117, 308-328
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2012117030308
Qualitative methods, is there something new to learn for Czech geography?
References
1. BECKER, G. (1996): Accounting for Tastes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 292 s.
2. , A., ELMAN, C. (2007): Case study methods in the international relations subfield. Comparative Political Studies, 40, č. 2, s. 170–194.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006296346>
3. BIDDLE, S. (2004): Military Power, Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 337 s.
4. , J. et al. (2011): Where Does the Knowledge for Knowledge-intensive Industries Come From? The Case of Biotech in Prague and ICT in Ostrava, European Planning Studies, 19, č. 7, s. 1277–1303.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.573136>
5. , B., GOERTZ, G. (2000): The methodology of necessary conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44, č. 4, s. 844–858.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2669285>
6. . S. (2011): Improving or Impairing? Following Technology Transfer Changes at the University of Cambridge. Regional Studies, 45, č. 4, s. 463–478.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003601909>
7. , D. (2011): Understanding Process Tracing. PS Political science and politics, 44, č. 4, s. 823–830.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429>
8. DENZIN, N., LINCOLN, Y., eds. (2000): Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, London, 1143 s.
9. , P., AKCALI, E., ANTONSICH, M. (2011): Turkey’s Bid for European Union Membership: Between “Thick” and “Thin” Conceptions of Europe. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52, č. 2, s. 196–216.
<https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.52.2.196>
10. ECKSTEIN, H. (1975): Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In: Greenstein, F., Polsby, N. (eds.): The Handbook of Political Science, Addison-Wesley, Reading, s. 79–138.
11. , J. (1991): Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing. World Politics, 43, č. 2, s. 169–195.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2010470>
12. , B. (2006): Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, č. 2, s. 219–245.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363>
13. FRIEDMAN, M. (1953): Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 334 s.
14. GEORGE, A., BENNETT, A. (2005): Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, 350 s.
15. , J. (1999): What Makes a Concept Good? An Integrated Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity 31, č. 3, s. 357–393.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246>
16. , J. (2004): What is a Case Study and What is it Good For? American Political Science Review, 98, č. 2, s. 341–354.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182>
17. , J. (2006): Single Outcome Studies, A Methodological Primer, International Sociology, 21, č. 5, s. 707–734.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580906067837>
18. , J. (2007): Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method? Comparative Political Studies 40, č. 3, s. 231–253.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006290784>
19. , J., SEAWRIGHT, J. (2008): Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research, A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61, č. 2, s. 294–308.
20. , J., KINGSTONE, P., LANGE, M., SINHA A. (2011): Democracy, History, and Economic Performance: A Case-Study Approach. World Development, 39, č. 4, s. 1735–1748.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.029>
21. GERRING, J. (2012a): Mere Description. British Journal of Political Science, forthcomming.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000130,26s>
22. GERRING, J. (2012b): Social Science Methodology, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 522 s.
23. GLASER, C. (2010): Rational Theory of International Politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 328 s.
24. , P. (1978): The International System and Regime Formation: A Critical Review of Anderson and Wallerstein. Comparative Politics, 10, č. 3, s. 419–438.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/421712>
25. , M. (2008): Nomotetická nebo idiografická geografie: alternativnost nebo komplementarita? Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae, 50, s. 19–31.
26. , P., SKÁLA, J. (2010): Kulturněgeografické aspekty rozvoje příhraničních periferií: analýza vybraných složek územní identity obyvatelstva Sušicka. Geografie, 115, č. 2, s. 223–246.
27. , L. (2009): Změny etnické struktury v kavkazském regionu od konce 80. let: Primární statistický rozbor. Geografie, 114, č. 2, s. 130–144.
28. KING, G., KEOHANE, R., VERBA, S. (1994): Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 300 s.
29. , P. (2011): The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-aged. Regional Studies, 45, č. 1, s. 1–7.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.537127>
30. , P. (1979): Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9, s. 469–479.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5>
31. LAITIN (2006): The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science. In: Schram, S., Caterino, B. Making Political Science Matter, New York University Press, New York, s. 33–55.
32. , J. (2008a): Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25, č. 1, s. 1–18.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318>
33. LEVY, J. (2008b): Counterfactuals and Case Studies. In: Steffensmeier, J., Brady, H., Collier, D. (eds). Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press, New York, s. 627–644.
34. , A. (1971): Comparative Politics and Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review, 65, č. 3, s. 682–693.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513>
35. , C., DALE, A. (2011): Nature, place and the creative class: Three Canadian case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99, č. 3–4, s. 239–247.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.006>
36. , J. WILSON, I. (2009): Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars. International Organization, 63, č. 1, s. 67–106.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090031>
37. , P. (2003): Useful Fiction or Miracle Maker: The Competing Epistemological Foundations of Rational Choice Theory. American Political Science Review, 97, č. 4, s. 551–565.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540300087X>
38. , J., GOERTZ, D. (2004): The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research. American Political Science Review, 98, č. 4, s. 653–669.
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041401>
39. , R. A SUNLEY, P. (2011): The new economic geography and policy relevance. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, č. 2 s. 357–369.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq042>
40. MEARSHEIMER, J. (2001): Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton & company, New York, 555 s.
41. MESQUITA DE, B. et al. (2003): Logic of Political Survival, MIT Press, Cambridge, 550 s.
42. , T. (1979): On the Scientific Status of Rational Models. American Journal of Political Science, 23, č. 1, s. 215–243.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2110782>
43. , M., ZECKHAUSER, R. (1966): An Economic Theory of Alliances. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 48, č. 3, s. 266–279.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/1927082>
44. , P., ŽENKA, J. (2010): The 2008–2009 automotive industry crisis and regional unemployment in Central Europe, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, č. 3, s. 349–365.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsq026>
45. , P., ŽENKA, J. (2011): Upgrading in the automotive industry: firm-level evidence from Central Europe, Journal of Economic Geography, 11, č. 3, s. 559–586.
<https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq023>
46. PORTER, M. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York, 896 s.
47. , A. (2012): Drawing Lessons from Case Studies by Enhancing Comparability. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 42, č. 1, s. 99–120.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393111426683>
48. SAYER, A. (1992): Method in Social Science. Routledge, London, 313 s.
49. SAYER, A. (2000): Realism and Social Science. Sage Publications, London, 224 s.
50. SILVERMAN, D. (2011): Interpreting Qualitative Data. Sage, London, 520 s.
51. SKOCPOL, T. (1979): States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press, New York, 407 s.
52. , L. (2008): Idiografická nebo nomotetická koncepce v geografii: kontraproduktivní spor o povahu a podstatu poznání. Geografický časopis, 60, č. 3, s. 299–315.
53. , B., BOTEA, R. (2008): Tilly Tally: War-Making and State-Making in the Contemporary Third World. International Studies Review, 10, č. 1, s. 27–56.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00746.x>
54. , V. (2004): Toward a dynamic theory of international politics: Insights from comparing ancient China and early modern Europe. International Organization, 58, č. 1, s. 175–205.
55. TOMEŠ, J. (2008): Ozbrojené konflikty po konci studené války. Disertační práce. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra soc. geografie a reg. rozvoje, Praha.
56. VAN EVERA, S. (1997): Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 136 s.
57. WALLERSTEIN, I. (1974): The Modern World-System, vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, Academic Press, 410 s.
58. WALTZ, K. (1979): Theory of International Politics. Waveland Press, Illinois, 251 s.
59. , J. (2008): Geografie, Riziko delokalizace zpracovatelského průmyslu Česka: Regionální aspekty. Geografie, 113, č. 1, s. 1–19.
