Geografie 2011, 116, 231-255
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2011116030231
Counterurbanization: Condemned to Be a Chaotic Conception?
References
1. , R., SILM, S., JÄRV, O., SALUVEER, E., TIRU, M. (2010): Using Mobile Positioning Data to Model Locations Meaningful to Users of Mobile Phones. Journal of Urban Technology, 17, č. 1, s. 3–27.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/10630731003597306>
2. , M. (2003): Selected Rural Growth in Estonia 1989–2000 – Sub- or Counterurbanization? Different Analyses – Different Results. Trames, 7, č. 4, s. 295–310.
3. , J. (2006): Rural Population Growth in Sweden in the 1990s: Unexpected Reality of Spatial-Statistical Chimera? Population, Space and Place, 12, č. 2, s. 171–185.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.407>
4. ANDERSEN, H. S. (2009): Explanation for Long-Distance Counter-Urban Migration into Fringe Areas in Denmark. Population, Place and Space, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1544-8452/earlyview Publikováno online 30. 6. 2009.
5. , M, BERG, N. G. (2010): Selling the countryside: Representations of rurality in Norway and Spain. European Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 17, č. 3, s. 277–292.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409356215>
6. , M. a kol. (2008): Amenity migration in the context of landscape-ecology research. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 1, č. 2, s. 5–21.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0006-3>
7. , M. a kol. (2009): Motivation and life style of the Czech amenity migrants (case study). European Countryside, 1, č. 3, s. 164–179.
<https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-009-0014-4>
8. BAUMAN, Z. (2002): Tekutá modernita. Mladá Fronta, Praha, 343 s.
9. BECK, U. (2004): Riziková společnost: Na cestě k jiné moderně. SLON, Praha, 431 s.
10. , M., O’REILLY, K. (2009): Migration and the search for a better way of life: a critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review, 57, č. 4, s. 608–625.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01864.x>
11. BERG, L. van den, DREWET, R., KLAASEN, L. H., ROSSI, A.,VIJVERBERG, C. H. T. (1982): A Study of Growth and Decline. Urban Europe, 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 162 s.
12. BERGER, B. (1968): Myths of American Suburbia. In: Pahl, R. E. (ed.): Readings in Urban Sociology. Pergamon Press, Oxford. s. 119–135.
13. BERMAN, M. (1982): All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. Penguin Books, New York, 383 s.
14. , B. J. L. (1976): The counterurbanization process: urban America since 1970. Urban Affairs Annual Rewiev, 11, č. 1, s. 17–30.
15. , G. (2010): Commercial counterurbanization: an emerging force in rural economic development. Environment and Planning A, 42, č. 4, s. 996–981.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a42206>
16. BOYLE, P., HALFACREE, K. (1998a): Migration into rural areas. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 330 s.
17. BOYLE, P., HALFACREE, K. (1998b): Migration into rural areas: a collective behaviour framework? In: Boyle, P, Halfacree, K. (eds.): Migration into rural areas. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, s. 303–316.
18. , D. L., KULCSÁR, L. J., KULCSÁR, L., OBÁDOVICS, C. (2005): Post-Socialist Restructuring and Population Redistribution in Hungary. Rural Sociology, 70, č. 3, s. 336–359.
<https://doi.org/10.1526/0036011054831170>
19. , D. L., SCHAFFT, K. A. (2002): Population deconcentration in Hungary during the post-socialist transformation. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, č. 3, s. 233–244.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00046-8>
20. CLOKE, P., LITTLE, J., eds. (1997): Contested countryside cultures: otherness, marginalization and rurality. Routledge, London a New York, 304 s.
21. CLOKE, P., MARSDEN, T., MOONEY, P. H. eds. (2006): Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London, 511 s.
22. , CH. C. (1933): Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Urban Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 23, č. 1, s. 1–19.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00045603309357110>
23. COOMBES, M. G., DIXON, J. S., GODDARD, J. B., OPENSHAW, S., TAYLOR, P. J. (1982): Functional regions for the population census of Great Britain, In: Herbert, D. T., Johnston, R. J. (eds.): Geography and the Urban Environment. Progress in Research and Applications, V., John Willey & Sons Ltd. Chichester, s. 63–112.
24. COSER, L. A. (1977): Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. Waveland Press, Illinois, 611 s.
25. ČERMÁK, Z. (2001): Vývoj migrační mobility v devadesátých letech v České republice. In: Hampl, M. (ed.): Regionální vývoj: specifika české transformace, evropská integrace a obecná teorie. DemoArt, Praha, s. 87–98.
26. , Z. (2005): Migrace a suburbanizační procesy v České republice. Demografie, 47, č. 3, s. 169–176.
27. , Z. HAMPL, M., MÜLLER, J. (2009): Současné tendence vývoje obyvatelstva metropolitních areálů v Česku: dochází k významnému obratu? Geografie, 114, č. 1, s. 37–51.
28. DAHRENDORF, R. (2007): Hledání nového řádu: Přednášky o politice svobody v 21. století. Litomyšl, Paseka, 141 s.
29. , F., a kol., (2002): Lay discourses of the rural and stated and revealed preferences for rural living. Some evidence of the existence of a rural idyll in the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, č. 3, s. 461–476.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00035-9>
30. , K. G. (1984): The conceptualization of counterurbanization. Area, 16, č. 1, s. 9–14.
31. , R. (1960): The Rural-Urban Continuum: Real but Relatively Unimportant. The American Journal of Sociology, 66, č. 1, s. 60–66.
<https://doi.org/10.1086/222824>
32. , T. (2006): What Clean Break?: Education and Nonmetropolitan Migration Patterns, 1989–2004. Rural Sociology, 17, č. 3, s. 373–398.
<https://doi.org/10.1526/003601106778070626>
33. , M. J. R. (2007): Migration to Rural Navarre: Questioning the Experience of Counterurbanization. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, č. 1, s. 32–41.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00374.x>
34. -SEXTO, C. (2009): Is the Counterurbanization Process a Chaotic Concept in Academic Literature? Geographica Pannonica, 13, č. 2, s. 53–65.
35. , A. J. (1982): Counterurbanization in Western Europe. Progress in Planning, 17, č. 1, s. 1–52.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(82)90006-X>
36. , A. J. (1989): Migration and Urbanization in Western Europe Since 1950. The Geographical Journal, 155, č. 1, s. 60–69.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/635381>
37. , T. (2003): Differentiation of Growth Processes in the Per-urban Region: An Australian Case Study. Urban Studies, 40, č. 3, s. 551–565.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000053914>
38. FLOWERDEW, R., BOYLE, P. (1992): Migration trends for the West Midlands: suburbanization, counterurbanization or rural depopulation? In: Stillwell, J., Rees, P., Boden, P. (eds.): Migration Processes and Patterns: Population Redistribution in the United Kingdom. Vol. 2, Belhaven, London, s. 144–161.
39. , T. (1999): Understanding Population Growth in the Peri-Urban Region. International Journal of Population Geography, 5, č. 4, s. 297–311.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199907/08)5:4<297::AID-IJPG152>3.0.CO;2-O>
40. , W. H. (1987): Migration and depopulation of the metropolis: regional restructuring or rural reneaissance? American Sociological Review, 52, č. 2, s. 240–257.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/2095452>
41. , G. V. (1985): The Nonmetropolitan Population Turnaround. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, č. 2, s. 259–280.
<https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001355>
42. , G. V., BEALE, C. L. (1996): Recent Trends in Nonmetropolitan Migration: Toward a New Turnaround? Growth and Change, 27, č. 2, s. 156–174.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1996.tb00901.x>
43. GANS, H. J. (1968): Urbanism and Suburbanism as a Way of Life. In: Pahl, R. E. (ed.): Readings in urban Sociology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, s. 95–118.
44. GELLNER, E. (2000): Pluh, meč a kniha: struktura lidských dějin. CDK, Brno, 263 s.
45. GEYER, H. S. (1996): Expanding the Theoretical Foundation for the Concept of Differential Urbanization. In: Geyer, H. S., Kontuly, T. M. (eds.): Differential Urbanization: Integrating Spatial Models. Arnold, London, s. 309–328.
46. GEYER, H. S., ed. (2002): International Handbook of Urban Systems: Studies of Urbanization and Migration in Advanced and Developing Countries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 610 s.
47. , H. S., KONTULY, T. (1993): A Theoretical Foundation for the Concept of Differential Urbanization. International Regional Science Review, 15, č. 3, s. 157–177.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769301500202>
48. GEYER, H. S., KONTULY, T. M., eds. (1996): Differential Urbanization: Integrating Spatial Models. Arnold, London, 343 s.
49. GIDDENS, A. (1984): The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkely and Los Angeles, 402 s.
50. GIDDENS, A. (2003): Důsledky modernity. Slon, Praha, 200 s.
51. GILLETTE, J. M. (1928): Sociologie venkova. Rolnické tiskárny v Praze, Praha, 494 s.
52. , P. (1979): Deconcentration without ‘clean break’. Environment and Planning A, 11, č. 3, s. 281–290.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a110281>
53. GORTON, M., WHITE, J., CHASTON, I. (1998): Counterurbanization, fregmentation and the paradox of the rural idyll. In: Boyle, P., Halfacree, K. (eds.): Migration into Rural Areas. Wiley, Chichester, s. 215–235.
54. GOSSNELL, H., ABRAMS, J. (2009): Amenity migration: diverse conceptualization of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, www.springerlink.com/content/9140n2843572mm05/. Publikováno online 8. 6. 2009.
55. , K. (1994): The importance of ‘the rural’ in the constitution of counterurbanization: Evidence from England in the 1980s. Sociologia ruralis, 34, č. 2–3, s. 164–189.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1994.tb00807.x>
56. , K. (2001): Constructing the Object: Taxonomic Practices, ‘Counterurbanization’, and Positioning Marginal Rural Settlement. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, č. 6, s. 395–411.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.238>
57. , K. (2008): To Revitalize Counterurbanization Research? Recognising and International and Fuller Picture. Population, Place and Space, 14, č. 4, s. 479–495.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.501>
58. , K., BOYLE, P. J. (1993): The challenge facing migration research: the case for a biographical approach. Progress in Human Geography, 17, č. 3, s. 333–348.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259301700303>
59. , J., COOMBES, M. (1995): In Search of Counterurbanization: Some Evidence from Devon on the Relationship between Patterns of Migration and Motivation. Journal of Rural Studies, 11, č. 4, s. 433–446.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1>
60. HAMPL, M., GARDAVSKÝ, V., KÜHNL, K. (1987): Regionální struktura a vývoj systému osídlení ČSR. Univerzita Karlova, Praha, 255 s.
61. HAMPL, M. (1998): Realita, společnost a geografická organizace: hledání integrálního řádu. Přírodovědecká fakulta UK, Praha, 110 s.
62. HAMPL, M. (2005): Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje, Praha, 147 s.
63. HAUSER, P. M., SCHNORE, L. F. (1965): The Study of Urbanization, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 554 s.
64. HORSKÁ, P., MAUR, E., MUSIL, J. (2002): Zrod velkoměsta – urbanizace českých zemí a Evropa. Paseka, Litomyšl, 352 s.
65. HUBBARD, P. (2006): City. Routledge, London, 298 s.
66. , H. (2001): Globality, rurality and neo-rurality. Agricultural Economics, 47, č. 5, s. 217–221.
67. , A., HYNEK, N. (2006): Investigating Hybrids and Coproductions: Epistemologies, (Disciplinary) Politics and Landscapes. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Geographica, 41, č. 1, s. 3–19.
68. , A. G. (1994): Population change and migration in Britain since 1981: evidence for continuing deconcentration. Environment and Planning A, 26, č. 10, s. 1501–1520.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a261501>
69. CHAMPION, A. G. (2007): Defining “urban”: the disappearing urban-rural divide. In: Geyer, H. S. (ed.): International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 1: Contentions Global Issues. Edvward Elgar, Cheltenham, s. 22–37.
70. CHAMPION, A. G., ed. (1989): Counterurbanization: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration. Arnold, London, 266 s.
71. CHAMPION, T. (1998): Studying counterurbanization and the rural population turnaround. In: Boyle, P., Halfacree, K. (eds.): Migration into Rural Areas. Wiley, Chichester, s. 21–40.
72. CHAMPION, T. (2001): Urbanization, Suburbanization, Counterurbanization and Reurbanization. In: Paddison, R. (ed.): Handbook of Urban Studies. Sage, London, s. 143–161.
73. , P. (1995): A New Phase of Urban Development in Western Europe? The Evidence for the 1980s. Urban Studies, 32, č. 7, s. 1045–1063.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989550012564>
74. , J., SCHNEIDER, J., BRUNZEL, S. (2007): Suburbanization, Mobility and the ‘Good Life in the Country’: A Lifestyle Approach to the Sociology of Urban Sprawl in Germany. Sociologia Ruralis, 47, č. 2, s. 148–171.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00431.x>
75. JOHNSTON, J. R., GREGORY, D., PRATT, G., WATTS, M. eds. (2000): The Dictionary of Human Geography. Blackwell Publishing. Malden, Oxford, 958 s.
76. , K. M., FUGUITT, G. V. (2000): Continuity and Change in Rural Migration Patterns, 1950–1995. Rural Sociology, 65, č. 1, s. 27–49.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00341.x>
77. KREJČÍ, J. (2004): The Paths of Civilization: Understanding the Currents of History. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 281 s.
78. , C., PUISSANT, S. (2007): Re-urbanity: urbanising the rural and ruralising the urban. Environment and Planning A, 39, s. 728–747.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a37366>
79. , D. J., a kol. (1989): Counterurbanization in Europe: Discussion. The Geographical Journal, 155, č. 1, s. 75–80.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/635383>
80. , H. (1996): Decentralizace osídlení – vize a realita. Část první: vize, postoje k venkovu a potenciální migrace v ČR. Sociologický časopis, 22, č. 3, s. 285–296.
81. , H. (1997): Decentralizace osídlení – vize a realita. Část druhá: decentralizace v realitě České republiky. Sociologický časopis, 23, č. 1, s. 27–40.
82. , U. (2003): Who is the Counter-Urban Mover? Evidence from the Swedish Urban System. International Journal of Population Geography, 9, s. 399–418.
<https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.296>
83. LITTLE, J. (1997): Employment marginality and women’s self-identity. In: Cloke, P., Little, J. (eds.): Contested countryside cultures: otherness, marginalization and rurality. Routledge, London a New York., s. 138–157.
84. , L., NUCCI, A. (1997): The ‘clean break’ revisited: is US population again deconcentrating? Environment and Planning A, 29, s. 1355–1366.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a291355>
85. , P. (2010): Enacting Rural Sociology: Or what are the Creativity Claims of the Engaged Sciences? Sociologia Ruralis, 50, č. 4, s. 311–330.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00522.x>
86. MAFFESOLI, M. (1996): The time of the tribes: the decline of individualism in mass society. Sage, London, 176 s.
87. MARSDEN, T. (2006): Pathways in the sociology of rural knowledge. In: Cloke, P., Marsden, T., Mooney, P. H. (eds.): Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London, s. 3–17.
88. MARTINDALE, D. (1966): Prefatory Remarks: The Theory of the City. In: Weber, M.: The City; translated and edited by Don Martindale and Gertrud Neuwirth. New York, The Free Press, s. 1–52.
89. MATRUCCELLI, D. (2008): Sociologie modernity: itinerář 20. století. CDK, Brno, 494 s.
90. , T., a kol. (2005): The Future of Urban Sociology. Sociology, 39, č. 2, s. 343–370.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505050544>
91. , P. (2007): Re-populating rural studies: Migrations, movements and mobilities. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, s. 381–386.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.04.002>
92. , A. S. (2001): Radical Intellectuals: What Happened to the New Urban Sociology? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, č. 4, s. 759–783.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00343>
93. , C. J. A. (2004): Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, č. 1, s. 15–34.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00031-7>
94. MUMFORD, L. (1961): The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations and Its Prospects. Harbinger, New York, 657 s.
95. , J., MŰLLER, J. (2008): Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze. Sociologický časopis, 44, č. 2, s. 321–348.
96. MUSIL, J. (1967): Sociologie soudobého města. Praha, Svoboda, 320 s.
97. NOVÁK, J. (2010): Lokalizační data mobilních telefonů: možnosti využití v geografickém výzkumu. Disertační práce. Universita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje. Praha, 169 s.
98. , J. (1992): The Cyclical Urbanization Model. A Critical Analysis. Geogr. Ann. 74, č. 2, s. 133–144.
99. , M. (2000): Teorie stádií vývoje měst a diferenciální urbanizace. Geografie, 105, č. 4, s. 361–369.
100. , M. (2007): Differential Suburban Development in the Prague Urban Region. Geografiska Annaler: Human Geography B, 89, č. 2, s. 111–125.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x>
101. OUŘEDNÍČEK, M., ŠPAČKOVÁ, P., FEŘTROVÁ, M. (2011): Kvalita života a role lidského kapitálu v depopulačních oblastech v České republice. Sociologický časopis, 47, č. 4.
102. PAHL, R. E. (1968): The Rural-Urban Continuum. In: Pahl, R. E. (ed.): Readings in urban Sociology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, s. 263–305.
103. PANELLI, R. (2006): Rural society. In: Cloke, P., Marsden, T., Mooheny, P. H. (eds.): Handbook of Rural Studies. SAGE, London, s. 63–90.
104. PAWSON, R. (1989): A measure for measures: a manifesto for empirical sociology. Routledge, London, 337 s.
105. , R., KUČEROVÁ, S., KUČERA, Z. (2010): Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie, 115, č. 2, s. 161–187.
106. PETRUSEK, M. (2007): Společnosti pozdní doby. SLON, Praha, 459 s.
107. , M. (2005): Differential productions of rural gentrification: illustration from North and South Nortfolk. Geoforum, 36, č. 4, s. 477–494.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.001>
108. PHILLIPS, M. (2009): Counterurbanization and Rural Gentrification: an Exploration of the Terms. Population, Place and Space, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.570/abstract.
109. , A. C. (1996): Discourses of Rurality: Loose Talk or Social Struggle? Journal of Rural Studies, 12, č. 1, s. 69–78.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00046-1>
110. , A. W. (1987): The interaction order sui generis: Goffman’s contribution to social theory. Sociological Theory, 5, č. 2, s. 136–139.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/201935>
111. REICH, R. B. (2003): V pasti úspěchu: diagnóza kapitalismu 21. století. Prostor, Praha, 423 s.
112. , S., RANDOLPH, W. G. (1983): Beyond Decentralization: the Evolution of Population Distribution in England and Wales, 1961–1981. Geoforum, 14, č. 1, s. 75–102.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(83)90008-8>
113. ROSE, G. (1993): Feminism & Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Polity Press, Oxford, 205 s.
114. , A. (1989): Comments: Rural depopulation and counterurbanization: a paradox. Area, 21, č. 1, s. 93–94.
115. SAUNDERS, P. (1981): Social Theory and the Urban Question, 1st ed., Hutchinson and Ross, London, 310 s.
116. SAVAGE, M., WARDE, A. (1993): Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity. MacMillan Press, Houndmills, 221 s.
117. , A. (1944): The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49, č. 6, s. 499–507.
<https://doi.org/10.1086/219472>
118. , A. (1945): The Homecomer. American Journal of Sociology, 50, č. 5, s. 369–376.
<https://doi.org/10.1086/219654>
119. , S, AHAS, R. (2010): The seasonal variability of population in Estonian municipalities. Environment and Planning A, č. 42, s. 2527–2546.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a43139>
120. , D. (2007): The changing faces of rural populations: (re) Fixing ‘the gaze’ or ‘eyes wide shut’? Journal of Rural Studies, 23, č. 3, s. 275–282.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.03.001>
121. SOJA, E. W. (2002): Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Region. Blackwell, Malden, 440 s.
122. SOROKIN, P., ZIMMERMAN, C. C. (1929): Principles of Rural-Urban Sociology. Henry Holt and Company, New York, 652 s.
123. , D. (1995): Counterurbanization: the Local Dimension. Geoforum, 26, č. 2, s. 153–173.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(95)00017-F>
124. , D. (1997): Counterurbanization and Depopulation Revisited: Landowners, Planners and the Rural Development Process. Journal of Rural Studies, 13, č. 1, s. 75–92.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(96)00059-9>
125. ŠIMON, M. (2008): Nové koncepty v urbánní geografii. Diplomová práce. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje. Praha, 76 s.
126. , M. (2011): Úspěšná integrace rumunské komunity z Bílé Vody. Český lid: Etnologický časopis, 98, č. 2., s. 155–172.
127. ŠIMON, M., OUŘEDNÍČEK, M., NOVÁK, J. (2009): In Search of Counterurbanization: Some Evidence from the Czech Republic. 3rd International Workshop on Post-communist Urban Geographies: Actors Shaping Urban Change, 17. 9. 2009, Tartu, Estonsko.
128. , T. (2000): Differential Urbanisation and Primate City Growth in Soviet and Post-Soviet Estonia. Tijdschrift voor Sociale ne Economische Geografie, 91, č. 1, s. 20–30.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00090>
129. TAYLOR, L. (2009): No boundaries: exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal, www.springerlink.com/content/k10m30w630042t1h/. Publikováno online 29. 6. 2009.
130. Tijdschrift voor Sociale ne Economische Geografie, 2003, 94, č. 1, Special Issue: Testing the Differential Urbanisation Model in Developed and Less Developed Countries.
131. , H. (1942): The Process of Urbanization. Social Forces, č. 20, s. 311–316.
<https://doi.org/10.2307/3005615>
132. , P. (1989): Counterurbanization: a Challenge for Socio-theoretical Geography. Journal of Rural Studies, 5, č. 3, s. 217–225.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(89)90001-6>
133. , D., STRAUSS, A. (1977): A demonstration that the current decondentration of population in the United States is clean break with the past. Environment and Planning A, 11, č. 13, s. 751–758.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/a090751>
134. WEBER, M. (1966): The City; translated and edited by Don Martindale and Gertrud Neuwirth. New York, The Free Press, 242 s.
135. , I. (1988): Rural depopulation and counterurbanization: a paradox. Area, 20, č. 2, s. 127–134.
136. , M. (2009): Rural geography: blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography, 33, č. 6, s. 849–858.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508105001>
