Geografie 2022, 127, 145-168
https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2022.002
Public transport accessibility: simulation of the usability of public transport in everyday situations
Josef Bernard
Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia
Received October 2021
Accepted February 2022
References
1. , M., LOWNES, N. E. (2011): A composite index of public transit accessibility. Journal of Public Transportation, 14, 2, 4.
<https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.14.2.4>
2. , J., DECKER, A., MIKEŠOVÁ, R., VOJTÍŠKOVÁ, K. (2016): Living and dealing with limited opportunities: Social disadvantage and coping strategies in rural peripheries. Sociální studia / Social Studies, 13, 2, 29−53.
<https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2016-2-29>
3. , R., PUCHER, J. (2012): Demand for public transport in Germany and the USA: an analysis of rider characteristics. Transport Reviews, 32, 5, 541−567.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2012.707695>
4. BURDA, T. (2014): Význam změn správních hranic v procesu formování vnitřních periferií na území Česka od poloviny 19. století. Dizertační práce, Univerzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Praha.
5. , G. (2004): Gap Analysis of Public Transport Needs:Measuring Spatial Distribution of Public Transport Needs and Identifying Gaps in the Quality of Public Transport Provision. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1895, 1, 137−146.
<https://doi.org/10.3141/1895-18>
6. , G. (2010): Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 1, 31−41.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.002>
7. , G., SHARKEY, P. (2017): Spatial foundations of inequality: A conceptual model and empirical overview. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3, 2, 1−33.
<https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2017.3.2.01>
8. , K. T., VAN WEE, B. (2004): Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport geography, 12, 2, 127−140.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005>
9. , Y. E., HASSAN, M. N., ABULIBDEH, A. (2016): A multi-criteria approach of assessing public transport accessibility at a strategic level. Journal of Transport Geography, 57, 19−34.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.09.011>
10. , M., MARADA, M. (2015): Sociogeografická regionalizace Česka. Geografie, 120, 3, 397−421.
<https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120030397>
11. HORÁK, J., IVAN, I., FOJTÍK, D. (2015): Time of Day Dependency of Public Transport Accessibility in the Czech Republic. In: I. Ivan, I. Benenson, B. Jiang, J. Horák, J. Haworth, Inspektor, T. (eds.): Geoinformatics for Intelligent Transportation. Springer International Publishing, 93−108.
12. CHVÁTAL, F. (2017): Vliv dopravní dostupnosti územní na ekonomický a regionální rozvoj v České republice. Disertační práce. Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Brno.
13. , V. (2017): Social and transport exclusion. Geographia Polonica, 90, 3, 247−263.
<https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0099>
14. KEIM-KLÄRNER, S., BERNARD, J., BISCHOF, S., VAN DÜLMEN, C., KLÄRNER, A., STEINFÜHRER, A. (2021): Analyzing social disadvantage in rural peripheries in Czechia and Eastern Germany: Conceptual model and study design, 170. Thünen Working Paper. Braunschweig.
15. , S., PRENER, J. (2014): Spatial aspects of transport behaviour in the Czech Republic after 1989. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Geographica, 45, 2, 53−77.
16. , J., PODLEŠÁKOVÁ, N. (2021): Lidský a demografický kapitál v periferiích Plzeňského kraje. Geografie, 126, 1, 97−122.
<https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2021126010097>
17. , V., CHMELÍK, J., VONDRÁČKOVÁ, P., MARADA, M. (2012): Developments in the public transport serviceability of rural settlements with examples from various types of micro-regions. AUC–Geographica, 47, 1, 51−63.
<https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2015.24>
18. , M. C. (2017): Measuring the geography of opportunity. Progress in Human Geography, 41, 1, 3−25.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515618104>
19. , S., ZHU, X. (2004): Accessibility analyst: an integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 1, 105−124.
<https://doi.org/10.1068/b305>
20. , W. S., KNAAP, E., DAWKINS, C., KNAAP, G. J. (2018): Opportunity for whom? The diverse definitions of neighborhood opportunity in Baltimore. City & Community, 17, 3, 636−657.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12318>
21. , J. (2018): Questioning territorial cohesion: (Un)equal access to services of general interest: (Un)equal access to services of general interest. Papers in Regional Science, 97, 2, 323−343.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12250>
22. , S. A., LOWNES, N. E., OSLEEB, J. P., BERTOLACCINI, K. (2013): A method to define public transit opportunity space. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 144−154.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.007>
23. , M., KVĚTOŇ, V. (2010): Diferenciace nabídky dopravních příležitostí v českých obcích a sociogeografických mikroregionech. Geografie, 115, 1, 21−43.
<https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2010115010021>
24. MARTENS, K., BASTIAANSSEN, J. (2019): An index to measure accessibility poverty risk. In: Lucas, K., Martens, K., Di Ciommo, F., Dupont-Kieffer, A. (eds.): Measuring transport equity. Elsevier, 39−55.
25. , S., WITTEN, K., MCCREANOR, T., O’SULLIVAN, D. (2012): GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 1, 15−22.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.001>
26. , S., SCHEURER, J., CURTIS, C. (2017): Urban public transport: planning principles and emerging practice. Journal of Planning Literature, 32, 3, 223−239.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217693570>
27. MDČR (2020): Koncepce veřejné dopravy 2020−2025, Ministerstvo dopravy České republiky, https://www.mdcr.cz/Dokumenty/Verejna-doprava/Pravni-predpisy/Zelena-a-bila-kniha-koncepce-verejne-dopravy (24. 1. 2022).
28. , J., MÜLLER, J. (2008): Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 44, 2, 321−348.
<https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.05>
29. , M. M., CEDER, A. A., GHAVAMIRAD, F., THACKER, S. (2017): Environmental impacts of public transport systems using real-time control method. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 216−226.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.12.006>
30. , A., GERTES MERCADO, R., FARBER, S., MORENCY, C., ROORDA, M. (2010): Relative accessibility deprivation indicators for urban settings: definitions and application to food deserts in Montreal. Urban Studies, 47, 7, 1415−1438.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353626>
31. RODRIGUE, J. P., COMTOIS, C., SLACK, B. (2006): The geography of transport systems. Routledge.
32. , T., MORIDPOUR, S., THOMPSON, R. G. (2016): Public transport accessibility in metropolitan areas: A new approach incorporating population density. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 273−285.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.019>
33. SEIDENGLANZ, D. (2007): Dopravní charakteristiky venkovského prostoru, Dizertační práce. Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Brno.
34. , V., MATTISSON, O. (2016): The role of public transport in society – A case study of general policy documents in Sweden. Sustainability, 8, 11, 1120.
<https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111120>
35. , M., VAISHAR, A. (2017): The relationship between public transport and the progressive development of rural areas. Land Use Policy, 67, 107−114.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.022>
36. , M., VAISHAR, A., STONAWSKÁ, K. (2015): Integrated Transport System of the South-Moravian Region and its impact on rural development. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, 53−64.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.012>
37. ŠULC, P. (2017): Dopravní dostupnost na základě nabídky veřejné hromadné dopravy v oblasti Ledečska a Zručska. Bakalářská práce, Univerzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Praha.
38. , I., MUÑOZ, J. C., HURTUBIA, R. (2021): Public transport accessibility accounting for level of service and competition for urban opportunities: An equity analysis for education in Santiago de Chile. Journal of Transport Geography, 90, 102919.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102919>
39. Zákon 194/2010 sb. o veřejných službách v přepravě cestujících a o změně dalších zákonů, https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2010-194.
